AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND FACTORS INFLUENCING GLOBAL OIL PRICES: A PANEL DATA APPROACH

Authors

  • Milan Tomić Independent Researcher, Bosnia and Herzegovina
  • Srđan Stevandić Independent Researcher, Bosnia and Herzegovina

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0303171t

Keywords:

oil prices, international trade, supply and demand, panel data, COVID-19, Global Financial Crisis

Abstract

This study examines the factors that impact global oil prices, focusing on the relationship between supply and demand in international markets. The authors used an econometric panel methodology to identify the primary factors influencing global oil prices, using Brent crude oil prices as the dependent variable. The study also considered alternative measures, such as Dubai and West Texas Intermediate (WTI) prices, as well as a composite global price index derived from the average of WTI, Dubai, and Brent prices, to ensure the robustness of the findings. The study found that key factors influencing global oil prices remained consistent across different dependent variables introduced into the model. The research emphasizes the critical role of supply and demand dynamics as the main drivers shaping global oil prices. On the supply side, variables such as oil reserves, international oil trade, and the number of active oil rigs were considered. The results indicated that an increase in active oil rigs is associated with increased oil prices, while an increase in international oil trade leads to price reductions. When oil prices rise, active oil rigs often increase, but with a specific time lag. This rig increase can further drive up oil prices, particularly when the market expects continued price growth or when investments in new rigs are financed by anticipated higher revenues from oil sales. Increased international trade in oil leads to a more excellent supply of oil in the global market, which drives down global oil prices. Although oil reserves showed a positive coefficient, they were marginally significant, suggesting a potential upward pressure on prices when reserves increase. This positive relationship between oil reserves and prices may reflect market perceptions of future supply constraints, where increased reserves signal potential future scarcity rather than immediate availability, thereby exerting upward pressure on prices due to speculative behavior and strategic stockpiling. On the demand side, industrial growth was a critical factor that significantly drove oil prices higher. At the same time, renewable energy consumption had a statistically significant adverse impact, reducing global oil demand and lowering oil prices. The study also examined the impact of major global events, including the COVID-19 pandemic and the effects of the Global Financial Crisis. It revealed that the COVID-19 pandemic had a statistically significant negative impact on oil prices due to worldwide lockdowns and economic slowdowns. However, the Global Financial Crisis did not exhibit statistical significance in the model using WTI prices, though it still negatively affected all models. The study employed various panel data regression techniques, including pooled, fixed effects (FE), and random effects (RE) models. Diagnostic tests for heteroskedasticity and autocorrelation were conducted, leading to the application of Robust Hausman tests that identified the fixed effects model as the most appropriate for this analysis. Moreover, the study used Driscoll-Kraay standard errors to correct for heteroskedasticity, autocorrelation, and cross-sectional dependence, which reinforced the fixed-effects model's validity. The key findings highlighted the importance of supply and demand as pivotal factors influencing global oil prices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Askari, H., & Krichene, N. (2010). An oil demand and supply model incorporating monetary policy. Energy, 35(5), 2013-2021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2010.01.017

Baek, J. (2022). Not all oil shocks on the trade balance are alike: Empirical evidence from South Korea. Australian economic papers, 61(2), 291-303. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-8454.12248

Effiong, E. L. (2014). Oil price shocks and N igeria's stock market: what have we learned from crude oil market shocks?. OPEC Energy Review, 38(1), 36-58. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/opec.12027

Ekong, C. N., & Effiong, E. L. (2015). Oil price shocks and Nigeria’s macroeconomy: Disentangling the dynamics of crude oil market shocks. Global Business Review, 16(6), 920-935. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0972150915597594

Fattouh, B., Poudineh, R., & West, R. (2018). The Rise of Renewables and Energy Transition: what adaptation strategy for oil companies and oil-exporting countries?. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26889/9781784671099

Hamilton, J. D., & Herrera, A. M. (2004). Comment: oil shocks and aggregate macroeconomic behavior: the role of monetary policy. Journal of Money, credit and Banking, 265-286. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1353/mcb.2004.0012

Jibril, H., Chaudhuri, K., & Mohaddes, K. (2020). Asymmetric oil prices and trade imbalances: does the source of the oil shock matter?. Energy Policy, 137, 111100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.111100

Jin, Y., Zhai, P., & Zhu, Z. (2022). Oil price shocks and bank risk around the world. The Energy Journal, 43(1_suppl), 1-28. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5547/01956574.43.SI1.yjin

Khalifa, A., Caporin, M., & Hammoudeh, S. (2017). The relationship between oil prices and rig counts: The importance of lags. Energy Economics, 63, 213-226. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2017.01.015

Magazzino, C., & Giolli, L. (2024). Analyzing the relationship between oil prices and renewable energy sources in Italy during the first COVID-19 wave through quantile and wavelet analyses. Renewable Energy Focus, 48, 100544. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ref.2024.100544

Majumder, M. K., Raghavan, M., & Vespignani, J. (2020). Oil curse, economic growth and trade openness. Energy Economics, 91, 104896. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2020.104896

Mokni, K. (2024). Detrended cross-correlations analysis between oil shocks and world food prices. International Journal of Energy Sector Management, 18(1), 183-199. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/IJESM-10-2021-0019

Nia, C. A., & Aminata, J. (2022). OIL PRICE FLUCTUATION AND THEIR IMPACT ON INDONESIA MANUFACTURING INDUSTRY. Jurnal Ilmu Ekonomi Terapan, 7(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.20473/jiet.v7i1.32408

Pesaran, M. H. (2015). Testing weak cross-sectional dependence in large panels. Econometric reviews, 34(6-10), 1089-1117. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/07474938.2014.956623

Ringlund, G. B., Rosendahl, K. E., & Skjerpen, T. (2008). Does oilrig activity react to oil price changes? An empirical investigation. Energy Economics, 30(2), 371-396. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2007.06.002

Shehzad, K., Zaman, U., Liu, X., Górecki, J., & Pugnetti, C. (2021). Examining the asymmetric impact of COVID-19 pandemic and global financial crisis on Dow Jones and oil price shock. Sustainability, 13(9), 4688. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su13094688

Van Robays, I. (2016). Macroeconomic uncertainty and oil price volatility. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 78(5), 671-693. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/obes.12124

Yoshino, N., & Alekhina, V. (2019). Empirical analysis of global oil price determinants at the disaggregated level over the last two decades. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3541511

Yu, Y., Guo, S., & Chang, X. (2022). Oil prices volatility and economic performance during COVID-19 and financial crises of 2007–2008. Resources policy, 75, 102531. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.resourpol.2021.102531

Zhu, H., Su, X., Guo, Y., & Ren, Y. (2016). The Asymmetric Effects of Oil Price Shocks on the Chinese stock market: Evidence from a quantile impulse response perspective. Sustainability, 8(8), 766. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080766

Downloads

Published

2024-09-20

How to Cite

Tomić , M., & Stevandić , S. (2024). AN EMPIRICAL ANALYSIS OF SUPPLY AND DEMAND FACTORS INFLUENCING GLOBAL OIL PRICES: A PANEL DATA APPROACH. SCIENCE International Journal, 3(3), 171–176. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0303171t

Metrics