REPRESENTATION OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT INDICATORS – STUDENT AND FACULTY PERCEPTION

Authors

  • Marina Ćirić University of Niš, Faculty of Philosophy, Serbia Author
  • Marina Semiz University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Education, Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/

Keywords:

higher education, student engagement, institutional context, partnership, NSSE indicators

Abstract

Student engagement is a new concept and phenomenon in the Republic of Serbia system of higher education as an essential element of the modern paradigm, student-centered education. Transformation of pedagogic, didactic, and methodical approaches leads to the student becoming an active participant in his own development. This process implies a prominent level of responsiveness to higher education institutions, faculty, and students. The main goal of this research is to identify individual indicators of student engagement and to determine the dominant indicators. Two instruments were adapted and used to collect data on the indicators of student engagement in the higher education context, College Student Report (NSSE) and a Faculty Survey of Student Engagement (FSSE). The mentioned questionnaires are complementary and provide insight into student engagement from the perspective of students and teachers. The research sample consisted of 632 students and faculty from different higher education institutions of the University of Niš, Serbia. The work was based on the NSSE theoretical concept and the results compared to similar research in different national contexts. The results indicate that the examined students perceive the higher education institution primarily as a place where they can express their opinion, exchange it with others and take the best from these interactions to build their personality. The role of relations and the partnership in construction of knowledge and meaning are emphasized. According to the data, the respondents estimated that the dominant role in their studies is played by the relationships they achieve in the institution. Therefore, the interaction that takes place in institutions can be of crucial importance for positive or negative experiences that students associate with the process of studying. The interviewed faculties gave relatively high evaluations to the presented areas and indicators. Within the categories, professors and associates are unique in assessing that effective teaching is the dominant indicator of student engagement. These data are in accordance with the quality improvement strategy at the institutions included in this research, in which the primary strengths are precisely teacher competencies.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abed, E. R., Al-Absi, M. M., & Abu shindi, Y. A. (2016). Developing a Numerical Ability Test for Students of Education in Jordan: An Application of Item Response Theory. International Education Studies, 9(1), 161-174.

Coates, H. (2010). Development of the Australasian survey of student engagement (AUSSE). Higher Education, 60(1), 1-17.

Ćirić, M. (2024). Angažovanje studenata i participacija u vannastavnim aktivnostima. Godišnjak za pedagogiju, 9(2), 23-36.

Ćirić, M. (2022a). Kvalitet angažovanja studenata u visokoškolskom kontekstu. Neobjavljena doktorska disertacija. Niš: Filozofski fakultet.

Ćirić, M. (2022b). Faculty Strategies and the Perception of Student Engagement in Higher Education. Facta Universitats - Series: Teaching, Learning and Teacher Education, 6(2), 141–154.

Fauzan, A., Harisman, Y., Yerizon, Y., Suherman, S., Tasman, F., Nisa, S., ... & Syaputra, H. (2024). Realistic mathematics education (RME) to improve literacy and numeracy skills of elementary school students based on teachers’ experience. Infinity Journal, 13(2), 301-316.

Fassett, K. T., BrckaLorenz, A., & Hurtado, S. (2020). Dealing with tough moments: Assessing faculty preparation for teaching challenges.

Guo, Y., Connor, C. M., Yang, Y., Roehrig, A. D., & Morrison, F. J. (2012). The effects of teacher qualification, teacher self-efficacy, and classroom practices on fifth graders' literacy outcomes. The Elementary School Journal, 113(1), 3-24.

Kuh, G. D., & Hu, S. (2001). The Effects of Student Faculty Interaction in the 1990s. Review of Higher Education, 24(3), 309–332.

Kuh, G. D., J. Kinzie, J. Buckley, B. Bridges, & J.C. Hayek (2006). What matters to student success: A review of the literature. ASHE Higher Education Report. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.

Kuh, G. D. (2009). The National Survey of Student Engagement: Conceptual and empirical foundations. In R. M. Gonyea & G. D. Kuh (Eds.). Using NSSE in institutional research. New Directions for Institutional Research, 141, 5–20.

Kundačina, M., i Ilić, М. (2015). Visoko obrazovanje i globalizacija. Zbornik radova sa znanstvenostručnog skupa “Znanost-Duhovnost-Odgovornost'“, str. 97-112. Bijakovići-Međugorje: Fakultet društvenih znanosti dr. Milenka Brkića.

Maloshonok, N. (2024). Do student engagement patterns differ across national higher education systems? The comparison of US, Chinese, and Russian high-level research-intensive universities. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 61(3), 475-486.

Mei, W. U., Parkay, F. W., & Pitre, P. E. (2016). Student–faculty interaction: A key to academic integration and success for ethnic minority students at a major university in Southwest China. Frontiers of Education in China, 11(4), 483-502.

National Survey of Student Engagement (2013). NSSE’s Conceptual Framework. Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Center for Postsecondary Research.

Neves, J. (2020). UK Engagement Survey. Advance HE.

Ross, H., Cen, Y., & Zhou, Z. (2011). Assessing student engagement in China: Responding to local and global discourse on raising educational quality. Current Issues in Comparative Education, 14(1), 24-37.

Semiz, M. (2020). Konceptualizacije i pristupi u definisanju kooperativnog učenja. Nastava i vaspitanje, 69(3), 291-312.

Schreiber, B., & Yu, D. (2016). Exploring student engagement practices at a South African university: Student engagement as reliable predictor of academic performance. South African Journal of Higher Education, 30(5), 157-175.

Strydom, J. F., & Mentz, M. (2010). Focusing the student experience on success through student engagement. Pretoria: Council on Higher Education.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-16

How to Cite

Ćirić, M., & Semiz, M. (2025). REPRESENTATION OF STUDENT ENGAGEMENT INDICATORS – STUDENT AND FACULTY PERCEPTION. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(1), 107-112. https://doi.org/10.35120/

Similar Articles

1-10 of 30

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.