INTEGRATED FINANCIAL REPORTING – STEP FORWARD IN SATISFYING THE INFORMATION NEEDS OF STAKEHOLDERS?!
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0304149dKeywords:
integrated reporting, corporate social responsibility, directive 2014/95/EU, accountingAbstract
The turbulent beginning of the 21st century, characterized by, among other things, financial scandals related to the operations of several well-known corporations, as well as the world economic crisis imposed the need for companies to provide stakeholders (external and/or internal), and especially current and potential investors, with additional information related to broader social and environmental aspects of their business. For this purpose, the concept of corporate social responsibility and integrated reporting has been developing for the last thirty years, as a tool that should meet the growing needs for financial and non-financial information. The most important accounting authorities (Financial Accounting Standards Board – FASB and International Accounting Standards Board – IASB), as well as the corresponding bodies within the European Union, are trying to regulate this matter with documents (codes, initiatives, directives, recommendations, etc.) with the aim of defining rules that will help the management of corporations to meet the growing information needs of stakeholders. Through a critical analysis of the positive and negative sides of the mentioned documents, comparing them with the existing regulations in the Republic of Serbia, we determined that the proponents of the concept of integrated reporting face challenges similar to those that characterize the process of standardization, harmonization and convergence of international accounting regulative (IAS/IFRS). Namely, there is an evident need for integrated reporting to be part of the annual financial report, but the structure and information that should be contained in those reports differ, which reduces their usability. Even Directive 2014/95/EU, which represent the only document on which the expert public agreed, failed to overcome the mentioned problems, so the need to revise this document is a confirmation that additional efforts are needed to increase the comparability, reliability and relevance of these reports. On the other hand, the adoption of IAS/IFRS that would deal exclusively with integrated reporting could contribute to the further development of this concept, because the inclusion of environmental accounting in the provisions of several current IAS/IFRS represents a solid basis for the creation of quality information on business sustainability, but their further shaping and publication depends on the degree of corporate awareness in that field, specific regulatory requirements of individual countries, as well as the level of accounting culture, which in our conditions is not at an enviable level. There is also a fear that too long harmonization, similar to IAS/IFRS, will create a kind of "vicious circle" in which the possibility or need to revise one of the related documents or possibly an accounting standard will be practically impossible due to their interdependence and intertwining with the provisions of other regulations.
Downloads
References
Damnjanović, S. (2021). Korak po korak do nefinansijskog izveštaja – Priručnik za kompanije, (https://smartkolektiv.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/Prirucnik_Korak-po-korak-do-nefinansijskog-izvestaja.pdf) (datum pristupa 11.10.2024.)
Dolamić, I. (2016). Regulativa nefinansijskog izveštavanja u EU (Direktiva 2014/95/EU) i regulativa u Republici Srbiji, Zbornik radova Uloga interne revizije i kontrolinga u nefinansijskom izveštavanju, Novi Sad, 3-19.
Đorđević, S. M., Mitić, N. (2022). Idealno finansijsko izveštavanje – (Ne)ostvariv cilj računovodstvene profesije, Zbornik radova sa naučnog skupa Računovodstvena znanja kao činilac ekonomskog i društvenog napretka, Ekonomski fakultet, Kragujevac, 111-9.
Elliott, B., Elliot, J. (2003). Financial Accounting and Reporting, Prentice-Hall.
Gogić, N. (2022). Nefinansijsko i integrisano izveštavanje, Ekonomija, teorija i praksa, broj 2, str. 88-104. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/etp2202088G
Gray, R. (2006). Social, environmental and sustainability reporting and organisational value creation? Whose value? Whose creation?, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, Vol. 19, No. 6, 793-819. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/09513570610709872
Knežević, G., Pavlović, V. (2019). Integrisano izveštavanje u funkciji smanjenja informacione asimetrije, (https://www.researchgate.net/publication/357323675_INTEGRISANO_IZVESTAVANJE_U_FUNKCIJI_SMANJENJA_INFORMACIONE_ASIMETRIJE) (accessed on 11.10.2024).
Marinović, N. (2019). Uvod u društveno odgovorno poslovanje, https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/ timber/meetings/05-csr-marinovic.pdf (accessed on 27.10.2024).
Martínez-Ferrero, J., Suárez-Fernández, O. & García-Sánchez, I. M. (2019). Obfuscation versus enhancement as corporate social responsibility disclosure strategies, Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 26(2), 468-480. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/csr.1697
Sekerez, V. (2016). Regulatorni okvir i kvalitet izveštavanja o održivom razvoju, Ekonomske ideje i praksa, 20/2016, 54-68.
Škarić-Jovanović, K. (2013). Finansijsko izveštavanje o ulaganjima u zaštitu životne sredine, Acta Economica, 11 (18). 83-104.
Vićentijević, K. (2016). Nefinansijsko izveštavanje kao dodatna vrednost privrednog društva, Zbornik radova Uloga interne revizije i kontrolinga u nefinansijskom izveštavanju, Novi Sad, 61-9.
Zakon o računovodstvu, Sl. glasnik RS, br. 73/19 i 44/21-dr. zakon.
Živkov, E., Nerandžić, B., Kuzmanović, B. (2015). A correlation Between the Function of Controlling and the process of Risk Management in the Company, IJIEM, Vol. 6, No 4, 179-90. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24867/IJIEM-2015-4-121