UNDERSTANDING THOMAS KUHN’S CONCEPTS AND IDEAS ON THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS

Authors

  • Greta Avdyli South East European University (SEEU), North Macedonia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej040453a

Keywords:

scientific revolution, paradigm shifts, knowledge, development

Abstract

Throughout the course of human history, countless events have unfolded across distinct stages and temporal contexts, each leaving a discernible imprint on the trajectory of civilization’s development. The emergence of science marked a profound transformation in modes of thought, wherein rationality became the principal foundation of reasoning. As Aristotle notes, Thales, Anaximander, and Anaximenes - Ionian philosophers of the sixth century BCE - were the first to inquire systematically into natural phenomena. These early stages of inquiry represent the formative phases of scientific investigation, during which science evolved through the formulation of increasingly sophisticated methods aimed at uncovering truth - if such a notion can be said to exist - or, more precisely, at establishing irrefutable facts. In his landmark work, The Structure of Scientific Revolutions (1962), Kuhn introduced a transformative framework for the philosophy of science. His shift from physics to the historical study of science was motivated by an interest in the quotidian practices of scientists and the mechanisms through which scientific knowledge evolves over time. The Structure of Scientific Revolutions was recognized by the Times Literary Supplement as one of the twenty most influential books published in the latter half of the twentieth century. The work generated widespread debate, as its central ideas resonated across disciplines - engaging natural and social scientists alike, as well as scholars within the humanities.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Baber, Z. (2017). Sociology of science: Historical and epistemic perspectives. Routledge.

Bird, A. (2017). Old rationalism and the new paradigm. In E. N. Zalta (Ed.), The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2017 ed.). Stanford University. https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2017/entries/old-rationalism-paradigm/

Hektoen International. (2017, January 22). Objections to Kuhn’s theory of scientific progression. Hektoen International: A Journal of Medical Humanities. https://hekint.org/2017/01/22/objections-to-kuhns-theory-of-scientific-progression/

Krauss, A. (2024). Debunking revolutionary paradigm shifts: Evidence of cumulative scientific progress across science. Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences, 480(2302), Article 20240141. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0141 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1098/rspa.2024.0141

Kuhn, T. S. (1970). The structure of scientific revolutions (2nd ed.). University of Chicago Press.

Layman, C. A., & Rypel, A. L. (2023). Beyond Kuhnian paradigms: Normal science and theory dependence in ecology. Ecology and Evolution, 13(7), e10255. https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10255 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ece3.10255

Martin-Michalska, A. (2023). Thomas Kuhn, Stefan Amsterdamski, and the cycles of scientific development. Studia Historiae Scientiarum, 22, 259–289. https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.23.006.17697 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/2543702XSHS.23.006.17697

Ochichi, P. (2023). An application of Thomas Kuhn’s Structure of Scientific Revolutions to the field of social development: A review of literature. Journal of Philosophy and Religion (JPR), 2(1), 166–176. https://doi.org/10.51317/jpr.v2i1.414 DOI: https://doi.org/10.51317/jpr.v2i1.414

Ritzer, G. (2000). The sociology of social paradigms. Sage. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0002716200569001027

Schindler, S. (2024). Normal science: Not uncritical or dogmatic. Synthese, 203, Article 108. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04527-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11229-024-04527-w

Tuboly, A. T. (2024). The historian as an ethnographer: Kuhn’s last philosophy of science. Metascience, 33(1), 43–47. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-023-00949-3 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11016-023-00949-3

Weinstein, G. (2025, May 6). Einstein, evolution of knowledge, and the Anthropocene: A critical reading of Jürgen Renn’s historiography. arXiv. https://arxiv.org/abs/2505.03450

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

Avdyli, G. (2025). UNDERSTANDING THOMAS KUHN’S CONCEPTS AND IDEAS ON THE STRUCTURE OF SCIENTIFIC REVOLUTIONS. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(4), 53-56. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej040453a