PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHERS IN AN INCLUSIVE SCHOOL-PREFERENCES, PARTICIPATION AND EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT FORMS OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING

Authors

  • Nataša Tančić University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Pedagogy, Novi Sad, Serbia
  • Jelena Đermanov University of Novi Sad, Faculty of Philosophy, Department of Pedagogy, Novi Sad, Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0203113t

Keywords:

inclusive school, professional development of teachers, modalities of professional development

Abstract

The current reform processes of modern school systems have been going on for decades with the aim of implementing inclusive education. Accordingly, modern pedeutological research in recent decades has focused on the study and modeling of the system of professional development of teachers. A professional development teacher represents a long-term and consistent process of developing teacher awareness of what he does, why he does it, but also identifies mechanisms by which he can improve his work and himself personally (Hargreaves & Fullan, 1992; Day, 1999; Kostović, 2003). In this continuous process of development, from primary education and throughout the working life, professional development is a way through which teachers improve their work, progress and expand their roles in the modern school. Professional development in work is seen as a complex, continuous process of acquisition, enrichment and systematic adoption of new knowledge, skills and necessities necessary for the realization of increasingly complex teaching roles. The aim of this paper is to look at the dominant characteristics of professional development (teacher preferences, diversity and representation of certain forms of professional development) from the perspective of teachers themselves. The sample consists of 265 primary school teachers in the Republic of Serbia, Vojvodina province. A questionnaire was constructed for the needs of the research. The results of research on the parameter of participation and experience with numerous forms of professional development show that most teachers have experience with each of the forms of professional development defined by the Rulebook on Continuing Professional Development and Advancement as Teachers, Educators and Professional Associates in the Republic of Serbia (Sl. Glasnik RS, No. 48/2018). The ranking of the prevalence of forms of professional development of teachers in the sample shows that the most common forms are: participation in current school projects and seminars. In assessing the usefulness of certain forms of professional development, all forms are generally highly rated. Teachers, however, find it somewhat more useful to take forms of training with a dominant practical dimension: consultation, exchange of experience or solving current problems with colleagues; attendance at demonstration classes of colleagues and professional and study visits to schools. The final part of the paper emphasizes the importance of the obtained results in the context of contributing to a more purposeful and efficient system of professional development of teachers, its adaptation and revision according to the needs of teachers and achieving quality education for all children.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Arnaiz-Sánchez, P., De Haro-Rodríguez, R., Caballero, C. M., & Martínez-Abellán, R. (2023). Barriers to Educational Inclusion in Initial Teacher Training. Societies, 13(2), 31.

Begeny, J. C., & Martens, B. K. (2007). Inclusionary education in Italy: A literature review and call for more empirical research. Remedial and Special education, 28(2), 80-94.

Day, C. (1999). Developing teachers: the challenges of lifelong learning. London: Farmer Press.

Đermanov J., Kosanović M., Đukić, M. i Stanić, D. (2012).Spremnost osnovnoškolskih nastavnika na stručno usavršavanje i stavovi prema inkluziji. U: Đukić, M. (ur.) Tematski zbornik: Inkluzivno obrazovanje: obrazovanje za sve.Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.15-41

European Commission (2014). Proposal for key principles of a quality framework for early childhood education and care. Report of the Working Group on Early Childhood Education and Care under the auspices of the European Commission.

Europaea, S. (2018). Key competences for lifelong learning in the European schools. Office of the Secretary-General of the European Schools, Pedagogical Development Unit: Brussels, Belgium, 72.

Friesen, D. C., & Cunning, D. (2020). Making explicit pre-service teachers’ implicit beliefs about inclusive education. International Journal of Inclusive Education, 24(14), 1494-1508.

Hargreaves, A., & Fullan, M. (1992). Understanding teacher development. Teachers College Press, 1234 Amsterdam Avenue, New York.

Hebib, E., Antonijević, R., & Ratković, M. (2019). Odlike i pretpostavke razvoja inkluzivne školske prakse. Nastava i vaspitanje, 68(3), 315-329. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas1903315H

Kostović, S. (2008). Pigmalion u razredu. Novi Sad: Filozofski fakultet.

Li, L., & Ruppar, A. (2021). Conceptualizing teacher agency for inclusive education: A systematic and international review. Teacher Education and Special Education, 44(1), 42-59.

Lambe, J., & Bones, R. (2007). The effect of school-based practice on student teachers’ attitudes towards inclusive education in Northern Ireland. Journal of education for teaching, 33(1), 99-113.

Milošević, D., & Maksimović, J. (2022). Inkluzivno obrazovanje u Republici Srbiji iz ugla nastavnika razredne I predmetne nastave - kompetencije, prednosti, barijere i preduslovi. Nastava i vaspitanje, 71(1), 7-27. https://doi.org/10.5937/nasvas2201007M

Pravilnik o stalnom stručnom usavršavanju i sticanju zvanja nastavnika, vaspitača i stručnih saradnika. Službeni glasnik RS, br. 14/4, 13/2012, 85/2013, 86/2015, 3/2016, 73/2016, 80/2016, 81/2017, 48/2018.

Pantić, N. (2017). An exploratory study of teacher agency for social justice. Teaching and Teacher Education, 66, 219–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tate.2017.04.008

Priestley, M. & Drew, V. (2019). Professional Enquiry: an ecological approach to developing teacher agency. In D. Godfrey, & C. Brown (Eds.), An eco-system for research-engaged schools. Reforming education through research (pp. 154-170). London: Routledge.

Tait, K., & Purdie, N. (2000). Attitudes toward disability: Teacher education for inclusive environments in an Australian university. International Journal of Disability, Development and Education, 47(1), 25-38

Tančić, N. (2022). Prediktori profesionalnog razvoja nastavnika u inkluzivnoj školi. Inovacije u nastavi-časopis za savremenu nastavu, 35(1), 1-16.

Waldron, N. L., & McLeskey, J. (2010). Establishing a collaborative school culture through comprehensive school reform. Journal of Educational and Psychological Consultation, 20(1), 58-74.

Downloads

Published

2023-09-26

How to Cite

Tančić, N. ., & Đermanov , J. (2023). PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF TEACHERS IN AN INCLUSIVE SCHOOL-PREFERENCES, PARTICIPATION AND EXPERIENCE WITH DIFFERENT FORMS OF PROFESSIONAL TRAINING. SCIENCE International Journal, 2(3), 113–118. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0203113t

Metrics