SMART CITIES SUSTAINABILITY ACHIEVEMENTS RANKING: PCA WEIGHTING

Authors

  • Žarko Rađenović Innovation Center University of Niš, Serbia Author
  • Tatjana Boshkov Faculty of Tourism and Business Logistics, Goce Delcev University –Stip, N. Macedonia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0204141r

Keywords:

Smart cities, Sustainability, Ranking, Principal Component Analysis

Abstract

Cities all over the world are looking for dependable and sustainable growth solutions as a consequence of expansion of citizen demands, ecological issues, and technology advancements. Comprehending the notion of smart cities requires understanding its fundamental multiple dimensions. Regarding the complexity of smart cities, a multilayered framework incorporating social inclusion, environmental sustainability, and inclusive economic growth is required. Six fundamental aspects of smart cities are identified by researchers: people, transportation, living, government, environment, and economics. Moreover, the main goal of developing smart cities is to use information technology to increase urban sustainability. In order to evaluate how well European cities have the capacity to change according to the requirements of their population, the aim of this study is to ensure an aggregate rating of smart city performance based on citizens’ needs. The research creates an important contribution by offering an extensive framework to measure smart cities’ urban performance using the multi-criteria ARAS (Additive Ratio Assessment) decision-making method. The analysis additionally provides a contribution by identifying the key smart cities’ indicators that have the greatest impact on Aalborg’s optimal urban performance achievement, making it the best-ranked, smart liveable and Danish sustainability „flagship“ city.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Kwok, P. K., & Lau, H. Y. (2019). Hotel selection using a modified TOPSIS-based decision support algorithm. Decision Support Systems, 120, 95-105. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2019.02.004

Lopes, A. P. F., Muñoz, M. M., & Alarcón-Urbistondo, P. (2018). Regional tourism competitiveness using the PROMETHEE approach. Annals of Tourism Research, 73, 1-13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.annals.2018.07.003

Mendola, D., & Volo, S. (2017). Building composite indicators in tourism studies: Measurements and applications in tourism destination competitiveness. Tourism Management, 59, 541-553. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tourman.2016.08.011

Nardo, M., Saisana, M., Saltelli, A., & Tarantola, S. (2005). Tools for composite indicators building. European Comission, Ispra, 15, 19-20.

Nilashi, M., Samad, S., Manaf, A. A., Ahmadi, H., Rashid, T. A.,

Munshi, A., ... & Ahmed, O. H. (2019). Factors influencing medical tourism adoption in Malaysia: A DEMATEL-Fuzzy TOPSIS approach. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 137, 106005. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2019.106005

Ostovare, M., & Shahraki, M. R. (2019). Evaluation of hotel websites using the multicriteria analysis of PROMETHEE and GAIA: Evidence from the five-star hotels of Mashhad. Tourism Management Perspectives, 30, 107-116. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2019.02.013

Verma, P. & Raghubanshi, A.S. (2018) Urban Sustainability Indicators: Challenges and Opportunities. cological Indicators, 93, 282–291, doi:10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.007 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2018.05.007

Williams, D.S., Máñez Costa, M., Sutherland, C., Celliers, L. & Scheffran, J. (2019) Vulnerability of Informal Settlements in the Context of Rapid Urbanization and Climate Change. Environ. Urban, 31, 157–176, doi:10.1177/0956247818819694. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0956247818819694

Zheng, C.,Yuan, J., Zhu, L., Zhang, Y. & Shao, Q. (2020) From Digital to Sustainable: A Scientometric Review of Smart City Literature between 1990 and 2019. J. Clean. Prod., 258, 120689, doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120689 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120689

Zhou, Y., Maumbe, K., Deng, J., & Selin, S. W. (2015). Resource-based destination competitiveness evaluation using a hybrid analytic hierarchy process (AHP): The case study of West Virginia. Tourism Management Perspectives, 15, 72-80. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmp.2015.03.007

Downloads

Published

2023-12-30

How to Cite

Rađenović, Žarko, & Boshkov, T. (2023). SMART CITIES SUSTAINABILITY ACHIEVEMENTS RANKING: PCA WEIGHTING. SCIENCE International Journal, 2(4), 141-146. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0204141r

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 185

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.