THE EUROPEAN UNION’S ENLARGEMENT POLICY CHANGES IN THE LAST DECADE – A SUCCESSFUL INTERNATIONAL PRACTICE OR DYSFUNCTIONAL TRANSFORMATION?

Miljana  Đurčević Cucić

doi:10.35120/sciencej0203097d

Authors

Miljana Đurčević Cucić Faculty of Political Sciences University of Belgrade, Republic of Serbia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0203097d

Keywords:

EU, enlargement, foreign policy, theory of practice, conditionality

Abstract

Since 2004, the European Union’s (EU) transformation and integration potential has been evident and limited. An unusual pattern of perceived threats and challenges precluded the EU’s enlargement. One country from the Western Balkans’ (WB) fold was found suitable over the last ten years to join the EU. The rest of the WB are still queuing in front of the gates of the EU family. The purpose of this paper is to assess how recent changes in the international arena, including suffering on Ukraine’s soil and providing candidate status for Ukraine at the same time, affected the EU “red lines” in the enlargement process, together with the lessons learned from the considerable enlargement in 2004. Does the EU enlargement policy as primarily part of the EU foreign policy still have the effect of a “screwdriver,” or has it eventually become a “hammer” of hard power and force by hitting suddenly foreign policy problems that look like nails (Kagan, 2003), as it seems in Ukraine’s example? Did the Lisbon Treaty bring profound transformation to enlargement policy, and is it still one of the EU’s successful stories? This article aims to answer these questions. The assessment method is based on the International practice theory approach and Christian Bueger’s and Frank Gadinger’s definition and determinants of practice known as the Commitments of International Practice Theory (relying on elements of practice defined by Emanuel Adler and Vincent Pouliot). This approach judges whether or not the EU is a global actor that fulfills all inquiries of creating international practice from the enlargement policy. Based on the results, it is confirmed that the EU is a worldwide actor surviving in times of global transformations and that the enlargement policy is a valuable international practice. However, changes in the conditionality policy in the EU accession process could lead to several scenarios, and one of them is the loss of interest in some of the candidate countries, which could cause perceiving the enlargement policy as a dysfunctional transformation in the future.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Adler, E. (2005). Communitarian International Relations. The Epistemic Foundations of International Relations. London and New York, Routledge.

Adler, E. & Pouliot, V. (2011a). International Practices: Introduction and Framework. In Emanuel, Adler and Vincent, Pouliot (eds.). International Practices (pp.3-36). New York: Cambridge University Press.

Adler. E., & Vincent Pouliot. (2011). International Practices. International Theory, Vol.3, Issue 01, 1-36. DOI: 10.1017/S175297191000031X

Bicci, F. (2011). The EU as a community of practice: foreign policy communications in the COREU network. Journal of European Public Policy, 18:8, 1115-1132.

Bueger, C. & Gadinger, F. (2014). International Practice Theory: New Perspectives. Palgrave Macmillan.

Bueger, C. & Gadinger, F. (2018). International Practice Theory (2nd ed.). Palgrave Macmillan.

Council of the European Union. (13 December 2022). Draft Council Conclusions on Enlargement and Stabilisation and Association Process, 15935/22. General Secretariat of the Council Delegations.

Đurčević Cucić, M. (2021). Doprinos Evropske službe za spoljno delovanje međunarodnoj praksi održivog razvoja. Politička revija, Vol.69, Issue 3/2021, 119-139.

Đurčević Cucić, M. (2022). Strukturne promene multilateralne diplomatije Evropske unije u Generalnoj skupštini Ujedinjenih Nacija. Politička revija, Vol.74, Issue 4/2022, 15-38.

European Commission. (1993). Accession Criteria. European Neighbourhood Policy and Enlargement Negotiations (DG NEAR). Retrieved from: https://neighbourhood-enlargement.ec.europa.eu/enlargement-policy/glossary/accession-criteria_en

European Commission. (5 February 2020). Enhancing the accession process credible perspective for the Western Balkans, COM(2020) 57 final. Brussels.

Friedrichs, J.& Kratochwil, F. (2009). On Acting and Knowing: How Pragmatism Can Advance International Relations Research and Methodology. International Organization, 63 (4), 701–731.

Hajer, M.A.&Wagenaar, H. (2003). Introduction. In Maarten A. Hajer and Hendrik Wagenaar (eds,) Deliberative Policy Analysis. Understanding Governance in the Network Society (pp.1–30). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Kagan, R. (2003). Paradise and Power: America and Europe in the New World Order. London: Atlantic Books.

Lynch, M. (2001). Ethnomethodology and the Logic of Practice. In In Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny (eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, (131–148). London/New York: Routledge.

Panke, D. (2014). The European Union in the United Nations: An Effective External Actor? Journal of European Public Policy, 21 (7), 1050–1066.

Schatzki, T.R. (2001). Practice Theory. In Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny (eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory, (1–14). London/New York: Routledge.

Schatzki, T.R. (2002). The Site of the Social. A Philosophical Account of the Constitution of Social Life and Change. University Park: Pennsylvania State University Press.

Schatzki, T.R. (2003). A New Societist Social Ontology. Philosophy of the Social Sciences, 33(2), 174-202. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0048393103033002002

Schatzki, T.R., Cetina, K.K.& Von Savigny,E. (eds). (2001). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory. London/New York: Routledge.

Shotter, J. (1993). Cultural Politics of Everyday Life. Social Constructionism, Rhetoric and Knowing of the Third Kind. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.

Swidler, A. (2001). What Anchors Cultural Practices. In Theodore R. Schatzki, Karin Knorr Cetina, and Eike von Savigny (eds.). The Practice Turn in Contemporary Theory (pp.74–92). London/New York: Routledge.

The Council of the European Union. (2008). Council Decision of 18 February 2008 on the principles, priorities, and conditions contained in the European Partnership with Serbia, including Kosovo, as defined by United Nations Security Council Resolution 1244 of 10 June 1999 and repealing Decision 2006/56/EC, 2008/213/EC. Official Journal of the European Union.

United Nations General Assembly. (18 May 2011). Resolution 65/276 on Participation of the European Union in the work of the United Nations, A/RES/65/276.

Wenger, E. (1998). Communities of Practice: Learning, Meaning and Identity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Wenger, E.& Snyder, W.W. (2000). Communities of Practice: The Organizational Frontier. Harvard Business Review, 78, 139–145.

Official websites:

Ministry of European Integration of the Republic of Serbia: https://www.mei.gov.rs/eng/

European Commission: https://commission.europa.eu/