PHILOSOPHY OF WAR IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: ETHICS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF MILITARY POWER

Authors

  • Aleksandar M. Pavić Military Academy, University of Defense, Republic of Serbia Author
  • Hatidža A. Beriša National Defense School “Vojvoda Radomir Putnik”, University of Defense, Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0402109p

Keywords:

artificial intelligence, war, philosophy of war, autonomous systems, ethics of war, responsibility, geopolitics

Abstract

War has always been a complex phenomenon that is simultaneously the subject of philosophical, moral, legal and technological re-examination. With the emergence of artificial intelligence and autonomous systems, war as a phenomenon is experiencing a fundamental transformation, not only in operational and tactical terms, but also in conceptual and normative terms. New technologies are changing the way wars are fought, but also the way wars are understood. Instead of war as human decisions and conflicts, contemporary studies of war imply a war in which algorithms, machines and autonomous systems make decisions with potentially deadly consequences, often without direct human oversight. This paper aims to take an interdisciplinary look at the impact of artificial intelligence on the nature of modern warfare, through the intersection of ethics, technology and the transformation of military power.

Starting from a historical overview of philosophical ideas about war, to contemporary approaches, the article explores how artificial intelligence challenges traditional paradigms and questions categories such as courage, responsibility, subjectivity and ethical choice. In particular, the focus is on the transformation of just war theory, both in terms of the justification for entering into war (jus ad bellum) and in terms of the principles within war (jus in bello). The use of autonomous weapons systems opens up a number of moral dilemmas: who is responsible for the decisions made by a machine? Can an algorithm be the subject of moral assessment? What is the role of man in the context of delegated lethal power?

The theoretical framework of the work combines philosophy, ethics, technological development and military theory, which is the basis of contemporary security studies. On the other hand, the triad of ethics, technology and transformation of power implies that the work considers normative and empirical aspects. While the use of the phrase “philosophy of war” points to a deeper, more fundamental reflection, not only on the application but also on the meaning of warfare in the age of artificial intelligence. The previously presented facts indicate how artificial intelligence fits into the strategic matrices of great powers and how new technologies are changing geopolitics, becoming a new source of global hegemony. Dominance in the field of artificial intelligence today has almost the same meaning as nuclear superiority once did.

The aim of the paper is not only to describe technological changes, but also to critically review the need for new ethical, philosophical and legal frameworks that will enable the understanding and regulation of war in the digital age. The research concludes that it is necessary to reexamine the fundamental categories that determine war, from subjectivity and responsibility, to the concept of the enemy and the ethics of violence, in order to adequately respond to the challenges brought by the age of artificial intelligence.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Hart, L. (1952). Strategija posrednog prilaženja. Beograd: Vojna biblioteka.

Hoover, S. M. (2006). Religion in the Media Age. Media, Religion and Culture (1st ed.). New York: Routledge.

Hunter, C., & Bowen, B. (2023). We’ll never have a model of an AI major-general: Artificial Intelligence, command decisions, and kitsch visions of war. Journal of Strategic Studies, 47(1), 116–146. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2023.2241648

Jagodzinski, J. (2024). The Trauma of the Image: Prisoner ‘Abuse’ in Abu Ghraib Prison. Studies In Media & Information Literacy Education, 6(1), 1-15. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.3138/sim.6.1.004

Johnson, J. (2022). The AI Commander Problem: Ethical, Political, and Psychological Dilemmas of Human-Machine Interactions in AI-enabled Warfare. Journal of Military Ethics, 21(3-4), 246–271. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2023.2175887

Kant, I. (2024). O večnom miru. Beograd: Dosije.

Klauzevic, K. f. (1951). O ratu. Beograd: Vojno delo.

Krishnan, A. (2022). Fifth Generation Warfare, Hybrid Warfare, and Gray Zone Conflict: A Comparison. Journal of Strategic Security, 15(4), 14-31. doi:https://doi.org/10.5038/1944-0472.15.4.2013

Molendijka, T. (2025). Just War Theory for Morale and Moral Injury: Beyond Individual Resilience. Journal of Military Ethics, 23(3-4), 201–218. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/15027570.2024.2442802

Namestiuk, S. (2023). Challenging the Boundary between Self-Awareness and Self-Consciousness in AI from the Perspectives of Philosophy. Futurity Philosophy, 2(4), 43-60. doi:https://doi.org/10.57125/FP.2023.12.30.03

Nicolaides, A. (2024). Waging a Just and Ethical War – Contemplating Saint Augustine, ‘Just War’ theory, Gaza, and other Philosophical Notions. Pharos Journal of Theology, 105(3), 1-18. doi:https://doi.org/10.46222/pharosjot.105.321

Pavić, A., & Beriša, H. (2024). Artificial intelligence impact assessment on national security strategy development. Science International Journal, 3(4), 19-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0304019p

Pavić, A., Jelić, D., & Đokić, M. (2024). Artificial intelligence as an asset for the improvement of decision-making cycle in military operations. Vojno delo, 76(3), 45-58. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/vojdelo2403045P

Slović, S. (2019). Bodijerov koncept simulacije u eri masovne komunikacije. Baština, 49, 167-175. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/bastina1949167S

Starčević, S., & Kajtez, I. (2024). Potreba za filozofijom u savremenom svetu. Nacionalni interes, 47(1), 7-28. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/nint47-48381

Syed, A. (2025, February 24). The Ethics of War and Peace. Essydo Politics. Retreved April 30, 2025 са http://essydo.com/2025/02/24/the-ethics-of-war-and-peace/

Taddeo, M. (2024). The Ethics of Artificial Intelligence in Defence. New York: ‎Oxford University Press.

Vacarelu, M. (2021). Artificial Intelligence: To Strengthen or to Replace Traditional Diplomacy. У F. Roumate, Artificial Intelligence and Digital Diplomacy. Cham: Springer. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-68647-5_1

Wallace, R. (2018). Carl von Clausewitz, the Fog-of-War, and the AI Revolution: The Real World Is Not a Game of Go. New York, NY, USA: Springer.

Wallington, G. (2024, Octobre 18). The Hollow Victory: A Reflection on Ethics and the Use of AI in War. Medium. Retreved May 1, 2025 са https://medium.com/@graham.wallington/the-hollow-victory-a-reflection-on-ethics-and-the-use-of-ai-in-war-65b08b3b2e32

Downloads

Published

2025-05-20

How to Cite

M. Pavić , A., & A. Beriša , H. (2025). PHILOSOPHY OF WAR IN THE AGE OF ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE: ETHICS, TECHNOLOGY, AND THE TRANSFORMATION OF MILITARY POWER. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(2), 109-115. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0402109p

Similar Articles

1-10 of 68

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.