TRENDS IN THE FORMULATION OF INSTRUMENTS OF NATIONAL POWER: DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AS A FACTOR OF CHANGE IN MODERN DIPLOMACY

Authors

  • Aleksandar M. Pavić University of Defense, Military Academy, Serbia Author
  • Hatidža A. Beriša University of Defense, Military Academy, Serbia Author
  • Nenad S. Stajković University of Defense, Military Academy, Serbia Author

Keywords:

digital diplomacy, instruments of national power, technology, artificial intelligence, digital transformation, diplomacy

Abstract

The realization of national interests through the concept of developing and using instruments of national power is one of the most widely accepted strategic approaches. Defining national interests, as well as the manner of using instruments of power, is a characteristic feature of each individual state. The generally accepted model based on four basic instruments of national power: diplomacy, information, military power and economy, or the DIME model, is increasingly subject to certain corrections that are a consequence of rapid changes in international relations, but also technological development. Contemporary trends in the formulation of instruments of national power, as well as the potential of digital diplomacy as a factor of change in modern diplomacy, point to the profound transformation that the digital era is bringing to international relations. By presenting changes in the definition of instruments of national power, the authors will analyze the impact of factors such as artificial intelligence and social networks on contemporary diplomacy. Defining potential challenges faced by digital diplomacy will serve as an example of the complexity of the development and implementation of instruments of national power in the contemporary international environment, which is faced with great technological progress and the growing power of artificial intelligence.

The methodological approach represented in the paper is based on the application of the content analysis method and the structural analysis of a large number of scientific and professional works, as well as other relevant public sources. Using the hypothetical-deductive method, the authors draw conclusions that should prove the hypothesis that the instruments of national power are constantly changing and in that process encounter various challenges, which are a consequence of digital transformation, technology, but also very turbulent changes in international relations and the strategic environment. The aim of the paper is to define contemporary trends in the development of the instrument of national power and to examine some of the challenges that this process faces. In addition to the above, a special aim of the paper is to use the example of the transformation of the diplomatic instrument of power to explain some of the challenges that digital diplomacy faces as a contemporary form of traditional diplomacy.

In order to better clarify the methods, ways and challenges faced by the scientific community, as well as strategists, in defining the instruments of power and changes in them, this paper offers an example of how and in what way digital diplomacy has emerged as a new factor of change in traditional diplomacy. The authors will define a number of challenges facing digital diplomacy in the 21st century, with a special emphasis on artificial intelligence and social networks.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Pavić A., Beriša A. H. (2024). Artificial intelligence impact assessment on national security strategy development. Science International Journal, 3(4), 19-27. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0304019p

Pavić A., Beriša H., Mihajlović D. (2024). Primena instrumenta meke moći Ujedinjenog Kraljevstva Velike Britanije i Severne Irske na Republiku Srbiju. Baština, 34(63), 133-143. doi:https://doi.org/10.5937/bastina34-51291

Belinda Osei-Mensah, Elizabeth Owusu Asiamah, Rainbow Sackey. (2023). Strategic Communication and Artificial Intelligence: Reviewing Emerging Innovations and Future Directions. Archives of Business Research, 11, 85-102. doi:10.14738/abr.111.13616

Rodriguez C. A., Walton T. C., Chu H.. (2020). Putting the “FIL” into “DIME”: Growing Joint Understanding of the Instruments of Power. Joint Force Quarterly, 97.

Chhabra, R. (2020). Twitter Diplomacy: A Brief Analysis. ORF Issue Brief No. 335, January 2020,.

Constantinescu, M. (2021). The National Security Strategy in the Current Environment: from DIME to a DIME-T Approach. International conference knowledge-based organization, 27, 20-25. doi:10.2478/kbo-2021-0004

Bjola C., Manor I. (2024). Digital diplomacy in the age of technological acceleration: three impact scenarios of generative artificial intelligence. Place Branding and Public Diplomacy. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/s41254-023-00323-4

Costa, V. (2017). Shaping Public Diplomacy through Social Media Networks in the 21st Century. Romanian Journal of History and International Studies, 4(1), 139-154.

Dixon, S. J. (2024, 7 10). Most popular social networks worldwide as of April 2024, by number of monthly active users. Retrieved 12 17, 2024, from Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/272014/global-social-networks-ranked-by-number-of-users/

Dumčiuvienė, A. (2016). Twiplomacy: the meaning of social media to public diplomacy and foreign policy of Lithuania. Lithuanian Foreign Policy Review, 35(92-118), 35. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/lfpr-2016-0025

Frey, C. (2024). Digital Diplomacy: The Impact of Technology on Modern Diplomacy and Foreign Policy. Current Realities and Future Prospects. Romanian journal of european affairs, 24(1), 107-126. doi:https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4864962

Cimmino J., Rothschild A. (2024, March 14). Twenty-First-Century Diplomacy: Strengthening US Diplomacy for the Challenges of Today and Tomorrow. Atlantic Council. Retrieved from Atlantic Council: https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/wp-content/uploads/2022/10/21st-Century-Diplomacy-PDF.pdf

Joint Doctrine Note 1-18, Strategy. (2018). Washington, DC: The Joint Staff.

Höne E. K., Anđelković K., Perućica N., Saveska V., Hibbard L., Maciel M. (2019). Mapping the challenges and opportunities of artificial intelligence for the conduct of diplomacy. Geneva, Switzerland: DiploFoundation.

Kurbalija, J. (2024). Digital diplomacy. Retrieved 12 18, 2024, from Diplo: https://www.diplomacy.edu/topics/digital-diplomacy/

Manor, I. (2019). The digitalization of public diplomacy. Cham: Palgrave Macmillan.

Miailhe, N. (2018). The geopolitics of artificial intelligence: The return of empires? Politique étrangère, I, 105-117. Retrieved from https://www.cairn-int.info/journal--2018-3-page-105.htm

Moore, A. (2023, March 21). How AI Could Revolutionize Diplomacy. Retrieved Април 13, 2024, from Foreign Policy Magazine: https://foreignpolicy.com/2023/03/21/ai-artificial-intelligence-diplomacy-negotiations-chatgpt-quantum-computing/

Ong'ong'a, O. (2024). Digital Diplomacy in Kenya: A Study on X (Twitter) Analysis and Communication Strategies of A Few Selected Diplomatic Actors. Society & Sustainability, 5(2), 1-14. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.38157/ss.v5i2.587

Petrosyan, A. (2024, 11 5). Number of internet and social media users worldwide as of October 2024. Retrieved 12 17, 2024, from Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/617136/digital-population-worldwide/.

Radanliev, P. (2024). Cyber diplomacy: defining the opportunities for cybersecurity and risks from Artificial Intelligence, IoT, Blockchains, and Quantum Computing. Journal of Cyber Security Technology, 1-51. doi:https://doi.org/10.1080/23742917.2024.2312671

Rashica, V. (2018). The Benefits and Risks of Digital Diplomacy. SEEU Review, 13(1), 75-89. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/seeur-2018-0008

Ritter, K. (2011, 5 26). Twitter diplomacy new face of foreign relations. Retrieved 12 17, 2024, from NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/id/wbna43185212

Marks S., Freeman W. C. (2024, February 16). Diplomacy. Retrieved Април 13, 2024, from Encyclopedia Britannica: https://www.britannica.com/topic/diplomacy

Scott, A. (2011). The Nixon Shocks: The Opening to China and New Economic Policy. In A. Scott, Allies Apart: Heath, Nixon and the Anglo-American Relationship (pp. 50-79). London: Palgrave Macmillan UK. doi:https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230348936_3

Brown S., Studemeister M. (2001). Virtual Diplomacy: Rethinking Foreign Policy Practice in the Information Age. Information & Security: An International Journal, 7, 28-44. doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.11610/isij.0702

Varela, D. (2024). Diplomacy in the Age of AI: Challenges and Opportunities. Journal of Artificial Intelligence General science (JAIGS) ISSN:3006-4023, 98-109. doi:10.60087/jaigs.v2i1.p110

Vevera, A. V. (2022). Critical Infrastructure Diplomacy – Tracing the Contours of a New Practice. International Journal of Cyber Diplomacy, 3, 41-49. doi:https://doi.org/10.54852/ijcd.v3y202205

Downloads

Published

2025-04-11

How to Cite

Pavić, A. M., Beriša, H. A., & Stajković, N. S. (2025). TRENDS IN THE FORMULATION OF INSTRUMENTS OF NATIONAL POWER: DIGITAL DIPLOMACY AS A FACTOR OF CHANGE IN MODERN DIPLOMACY. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(1), 25-33. https://scienceij.com/index.php/sij/article/view/10

Similar Articles

1-10 of 23

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.