CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL AND CRIMINALISTIC ASPECTS OF THE INTERROGATION OF THE ACCUSED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA

Authors

  • Jelena Matijašević University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The Republic of Serbia Author
  • Joko Dragojlović University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The Republic of Serbia Author
  • Nenad Bingulac University Business Academy in Novi Sad, Faculty of Law for Commerce and Judiciary in Novi Sad, The Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0403001m

Keywords:

interrogation of the accused, evidentiary proceedings, criminal procedure, criminalistic rules, Republic of Serbia

Abstract

Process of proving a fact is a complex and diverse procedural activity of parties to criminal proceedings and the criminal court in order to establish legally relevant and other facts in criminal proceedings. The provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code of the Republic of Serbia regulate evidentiary proceedings. One of the most important evidentiary activity is the hearing of the accused. The purpose of the hearing of the accused is twofold, namely to present to the accused what he is accused of, for which criminal act he is accused of, and to give him the opportunity to defend himself through the hearing. In this way, the defendant becomes familiar with the evidence that exists against him. The subject of this paper is the criminalistic and criminal procedural aspects of the hearing of the accused, which are very closely related. The application of criminalistic rules is inextricably linked to the legal provisions governing the criminal procedure and provides a significant guideline in order to obtain the best possible testimony. A successful hearing of the defendant should result in obtaining a statement that is legal and complete. The complexity and importance of the selected topic of this paper also requires the application of a certain methodology. The basic methods that will be applied for the needs of this paper are the normative method, the method of qualitative content analysis, the descriptive method, as well as the method of data analysis and interpretation, with consultation and consideration of different views of distinguished authors.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Aleksić, Ž., Škulić, M. & Žarković, M. (2004). Leksikon kriminalistike. Beograd. Živojin Aleksić.

Aleksić, Ž., Škulić, M. (2011). Kriminalistika. Beograd: Univerzitet u Beogradu, Pravni fakultet.

Bejatović, S., Škulić, M., Đurđić, Vo., Ilić, G., Čvorović, D., Milojević, D., Đorđević, D., Kiurski, J., Matić, M., Tintor, J., Subotić, D., Komlen Nikolić, L., Lazić, R., Nenadić, S., Trninić, V., & Plazinić, M. (2013). Priručnik za javne tužioce za primenu novog Zakonika o krivičnom postupku (ur.: Bejatović, S., Škulić, M. i Ilić, G.). Beograd. Udruženje javnih tužilaca i zamenika javnih tužilaca Srbije.

Bejatović, S. (2014). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd. JP Službeni glasnik.

Beljanski, V., Delibašić, V. & Tintor, J. (2019). Priručnik za postupanje advokata u krivičnom postupku. Beograd. Misija OEBS-a u Srbiji i Advokatska komora Srbije.

Brkić, S. (2014). Krivično procesno pravo I. Novi Sad. Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu.

Feješ I. (2011). Taktički blef – lukavstvo u saslušanju okrivljenog. Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Novom Sadu, 45 (2), 111-137.

Grubač, M. (2004). Krivično procesno pravo: Uvod i opšti deo. Beograd: Službeni glasnik.

Grubač, M. (2006). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd. JP Službeni glasnik.

Matijašević Obradović, J. & Zarubica, S. (2018). Opasnost od bekstva kao razlog za određivanje pritvora– legislativni tretman i primeri iz sudske prakse. Pravo – teorija i praksa, 35 (4-6), pp. 1-16. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/ptp1806001M

Matijašević, J. (2024). Krivično procesno pravo, opšti deo. Drugo izmenjeno I dopunjeno izdanje. Novi Sad: Pravni fakultet za privredu I pravosuđe u Novom Sadu.

Matijević, M., Marković, M. (2013). Kriminalistika. Novi Sad. Pravni fakultet za privredu i pravosuđe.

Mirkov, Ž. (2019). O pojmu okrivljenog i njegovom iskazu u krivičnom postupku. Civitas, 9 (2), 161-176. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/Civitas1902161M

Mirkov, Ž. (2019a). Kriminalistička pravila o saslušanju okrivljenog od strane predstavnika policije ili javnog tužilaštva kroz faze izvođenja ove dokazne radnje. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 91 (3), 311-330. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv91-24873

Mirkov, Ž. (2021). Priprema i planiranje saslušanja okrivljenog u funkciji pribavljanja zakonitog i potpunog iskaza. Glasnik Advokatske komore Vojvodine, 93 (3), 825-844. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/gakv93-25941

Simonović, B. (2004). Kriminalistika. Kragujevac. Pravni fakultet, Institut za pravne i društvene nauke.

Stevanović, Č., Stanojević, P. (2005). Krivično procesno pravo. Niš. Sven.

Škulić, M. (2011). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Škulić, M. (2013). Krivično procesno pravo. Beograd. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu.

Škulić, M., Bugarski, T. (2015). Krivično procesno pravo. Novi Sad. Centar za izdavačku delatnost, Pravni fakultet, Univerzitet u Novom Sadu.

Vodinelić, V. (1996). Kriminalistika. Beograd: Zavod za udžbenike i nastavna sredstva.

Zakonik o krivičnom postupku [Criminal Procedure Code], “Sl. glasnik RS", br. 72/2011, 101/2011, 121/2012, 32/2013, 45/2013, 55/2014, 35/2019, 27/2021 - odluka US i 62/2021 - odluka US.

Žarković, M. (2010). Kriminalistička taktika, drugo, izmenjeno i dopunjeno izdanje. Beograd, Kriminalističko policijska akademija.

Downloads

Published

2025-10-02

How to Cite

Matijašević, J., Dragojlović, J., & Bingulac, N. (2025). CRIMINAL PROCEDURAL AND CRIMINALISTIC ASPECTS OF THE INTERROGATION OF THE ACCUSED IN CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE REPUBLIC OF SERBIA. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(3), 1-6. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0403001m