THE ROLE OF THE LATIN LANGUAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF ANATOMICAL NOMENCLATURE

Authors

  • Dimitar Mirchev Medical University of Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej040461m

Keywords:

Latin language, anatomical nomenclature, terminology, standardization

Abstract

Latin has played a fundamental role in the creation, consolidation, and continuous development of anatomical nomenclature from the Renaissance to the present day. The aim of this article is to examine the linguistic and conceptual development of anatomical terminology and to explore the lasting influence of Latin on the standardization of anatomical nomenclature. The study uses a historical-linguistic and descriptive method, analyzing key moments from the early Greek names of body parts to the contemporary Terminologia Anatomica (TA2023AG). The results show that the adoption of Latin as the lingua franca of anatomy has provided a basis for semantic precision, morphological consistency, and cross-cultural scientific communication. Furthermore, the systematic revisions from Basle Nomina Anatomica (1895) through Nomina Anatomica (1955) to Terminologia Anatomica (1998, 2023) illustrate the dynamic interaction between linguistic tradition and scientific innovation. The discussion highlights the importance of Latin in contemporary medical education and international standardization, emphasizing its irreplaceable function as a unifying linguistic code in the biomedical sciences. In conclusion, the thesis on the need to preserve Latin as a reference framework in anatomical terminology is presented, along with the integration of modern bilingual structures that reflect current linguistic and didactic realities, as well as the need for its presence in the curricula of medical specialties. The importance of Latin is emphasized not as an anachronism, but as one of the most reliable and appropriate tools for scientific clarity, standardization, and universalism.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Britannica Editors. (2025, July 15). Friedrich Gustav Jacob Henle. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved October 30, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Friedrich-Gustav-Jacob-Henle

Eycleshymer, Albert (1917). Anatomical names especially the Basle nomina anatomica (BNA), p.10, New York W. Wood.

Federative International Programme on Anatomical Terminologies (FIPAT). (2023). Terminologia Anatomica 2023 (TA2023AG). Würzburg: Anatomische Gesellschaft.

Ghosh, S. K. (2021). Human anatomy: Historical and conceptual foundations. Springer.

Hildebrandt, S. (2016). The history of anatomy: Past, present, and future. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9(2), 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1552 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1552

Hyrtl, J. (1880). Onomatologia anatomica: Geschichte und Kritik der anatomischen Sprache der Gegenwart, mit besonderer Berücksichtigung ihrer Barbarismen, Widersinnigkeiten, Tropen und grammatikalischen Fehler (pp. 6–14). Wien: W. Braumüller. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5962/bhl.title.26730

Kachlik, D., Baca, V., Bozdechova, I., Cech, P., & Musil, V. (2008). Anatomical terminology and nomenclature: past, present and highlights. Surgical and radiologic anatomy : SRA, 30(6), 459–466. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0357-y DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00276-008-0357-y

Kemp, M. (2017). Leonardo da Vinci: The marvellous works of nature and man. Oxford University Press.

Kinne-Saffran, E., & Kinne, R. K. (1994). Jacob Henle: the kidney and beyond. American journal of nephrology, 14(4-6), 355–360. https://doi.org/10.1159/000168747 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1159/000168747

Pretterklieber M. L. (2024). Nomina anatomica-unde venient et quo vaditis?. Anatomical science international, 99(4), 333–347. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-024-00762-w DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s12565-024-00762-w

Rey, A. (2020). The persistence of Latin in medical and scientific terminology. Language and Communication in Medicine, 42(3), 201–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lcim.2020.03.005

Sakai T (2007) Historical evolution of anatomical terminology from ancient to modern. Anat Sci Int 82:65–81 10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00180.x DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1447-073X.2007.00180.x

Sudhoff, K. (2002). Essays in the history of medicine. Johns Hopkins University Press.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica (2024, October 28). anatomy. Encyclopedia Britannica. Retrieved October 30, 2025, from https://www.britannica.com/science/anatomy

Tzamaloukas, A. H., & D’Antoni, A. V. (2022). The continuing importance of Latin in modern anatomical and medical terminology. Clinical Anatomy, 35(4), 501–509. https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23843 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/ca.23843

Vocabulary.com. (n.d.). Nomenclature. In Vocabulary.com Dictionary. Retrieved March 9, 2025, from https://www.vocabulary.com/dictionary/nomenclature

Whitmore, I. (2019). Evolution of anatomical terminology and the role of the Federative Committee on Anatomical Terminology. European Journal of Anatomy, 23(1), 7–14.

Wilhelm His. Die anatomische Nomenclatur: Nomina anatomica. Leipzig: Veit & Comp., p.1-2,1895.

Williams, P. L. (Ed.). (1998). Terminologia Anatomica: International Anatomical Terminology. Thieme.

Yamada, M., & Shimizu, Y. (2021). Digital anatomy and the modernization of Terminologia Anatomica: Challenges and perspectives. Journal of Anatomy and Education, 44(2), 89–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.janat.2021.05.003

Downloads

Published

2025-12-23

How to Cite

Mirchev, D. (2025). THE ROLE OF THE LATIN LANGUAGE IN THE DEVELOPMENT AND STANDARDIZATION OF ANATOMICAL NOMENCLATURE. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(4), 61-65. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej040461m