INVESTIGATING THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN WORK ENVIRONMENT, PROFESSIONAL DEVELOPMENT SUPPORT, AND FINANCIAL INCENTIVES IN THE CONTEXT OF IT PROFESSIONALS' MOBILITY: A SEM ANALYSIS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0401203cKeywords:
work environment, support for professional development, salaries and incentives, change of residence, IT company.Abstract
This study examines the relationship between work environment, salaries and incentives, and support for professional development in the context of IT professionals' mobility. Using Structural Equation Modelling (SEM), the research analyses data from 171 employees in the IT sector, considering various demographic factors. The findings indicate that salaries and incentives significantly impact both the work environment and support for professional development. Additionally, professional development support and financial incentives strongly influence the decision to relocate for career advancement. The results confirm five proposed hypotheses, demonstrating positive and statistically significant relationships between the analysed constructs. The highest variance explanation is observed for change of residence (84.36%), followed by support for professional development (75.54%), while work environment exhibits the lowest explained variance (43.23%). The variable salaries and incentives is exogenous, meaning it is not influenced by other factors in the model. These findings suggest that improving financial compensation and fostering a supportive work environment can enhance professional development opportunities and reduce workforce turnover. Furthermore, IT companies can benefit from targeted talent retention strategies by understanding the key drivers of employee mobility. This paper offers deeper insight into workforce mobility and employee retention, highlighting the significance of professional development and financial incentives. The results offer practical implications for IT organizations aiming to create a more attractive work environment and encourage long-term employee commitment. Future research should explore additional factors influencing mobility decisions, such as remote work policies and organizational culture.
Downloads
References
Ab Hamid, M. R., Sami, W., & Sidek, M. M. (2017, September). Discriminant validity assessment: Use of Fornell & Larcker criterion versus HTMT criterion. In Journal of physics: Conference series, 890(1), 012163. IOP Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/890/1/012163
Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological bulletin, 107(2), 238-246. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//0033-2909.107.2.238
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981). Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of marketing research, 18(1), 39-50. https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/002224378101800104
Gorji, S., Kueckelhaus, M., Pehlke, B., Hirsch, T., & Oliveira, F. A. (2025). Gender Gap? A Survey among Plastic Surgeons in Germany. Journal of Surgical Education, 82(3), 103402. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103402 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsurg.2024.103402
Hair, J., Black, W.C., Babin, B. J., & Anderson, R.E. (2010). Multivariate Data Analysis (7th Edition). NJ: Prentice-Hall Publication.
Henseler, J., Ringle, C. M., & Sarstedt, M. (2015). A new criterion for assessing discriminant validity in variance-based structural equation modeling. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 43, 115-135. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-014-0403-8
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3(4), 424-453. https://doi.org/10.1037/1082-989X.3.4.424 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037//1082-989X.3.4.424
Hughes, C., Niu, Y., & Greer, T. W. (2025). Career Development and Virtual Remote Work. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75899-7 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-75899-7
Kline, R. B. (1998). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York, NY: The Guilford Press.
Kukolj, S., Deretić, N., & Adžić, S. (2024). Factors influencing job change with relocation and employee satisfaction in IT companies. SCIENCE International Journal, 3(3), 141-147. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0303141k DOI: https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0303141k
Satterthwaite, E. V., Robbins, M., Crespo, G. O., Puskic, P. S., Giddens, J., Kostianaia, E., Giron-Nava, A., Elsler, L. G, Rguez-Baron J. M., & Brodnicke, O. B. (2025). Global priorities for ocean sustainability from Early Career Ocean Professionals. ICES Journal of Marine Science, 82(1), fsae201. https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae201 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsae201
Shakil, T.I., Tariq, A., Memon, M.A., Torkkeli, M. (2024). Adopting Tele-migration in Developing Asian Market: Exploring Drivers in the Face of Change. In: Endress, T., Badir, Y.F. (eds) Business and Management in Asia: Disruption and Change. Springer, Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9371-0_8 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-99-9371-0_8
Vilhelmsson, A., Cofina, I. P., Wolodarski, M., & Alfvén, T. (2025). Developing a guide for sustainable healthcare practice: A case study from the Swedish Society of Medicine. The Journal of Climate Change and Health, 100413. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100413 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.joclim.2025.100413
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
