POLAND IN THE CONCEPT OF EXTENDED DETERRENCE: FROM THE SOLIDARITY MOVEMENT TO THE UKRAINIAN CONFLICT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0501119mKeywords:
extended deterrence, Russo-Polish relations, USA, Solidarity, NATO, Russia, Ukrainian conflict, security dilemmaAbstract
This paper examines Poland's experience with extended deterrence across two pivotal historical junctures: the Solidarity Movement crisis (1980 - 1981) and the ongoing Russo-Ukrainian conflict (2022 - present). The analysis applies a comparative historical method supported by primary sources including declassified CIA documents and Politburo transcripts, alongside secondary academic literature and quantitative defense data. Poland's geopolitical position, shaped by centuries of partition, Soviet domination, and the trauma of the Molotov - Ribbentrop Pact, has produced a security culture defined by acute vulnerability and deep-seated reliance on external guarantors. During the Solidarity crisis, the Carter and Reagan administrations pursued a proactive deterrence strategy through explicit threats of sanctions, material support for the opposition, coordination with NATO allies, and exploitation of the Sino-Soviet rivalry. While the strategy successfully prevented direct Soviet military intervention, it failed to prevent the imposition of martial law in December 1981. Nevertheless, Solidarity's underground survival, sustained by continued Western support, ultimately contributed to Poland's democratic transition and the broader collapse of the Eastern Bloc. In the context of the Ukrainian conflict, Poland has evolved from a passive object of geopolitical competition into an assertive security actor, dramatically increasing its defense budget to over 3% of GDP, providing substantial military assistance to Ukraine, deepening U.S. military presence on its territory, and actively pursuing NATO nuclear sharing arrangements. The paper identifies strong strategic continuity in Poland's transatlantic orientation across both periods, while also identifying key limitations: excessive dependence on an external guarantor creates moral hazard, and intensified militarization risks deepening the security dilemma with Russia.
Downloads
References
Applebaum, A. (2012). Iron Curtain: The Crushing of Eastern Europe 1944–1956. New York: Doubleday.
Beach, D., & Pedersen, R. B. (2013). Process-Tracing Methods. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3998/mpub.2556282
Biskupski, M. B. (2018). History of Poland. Santa Barbara: ABC-CLIO. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9798400665240
Bouzarovski, S., & Konieczny, M. (2010). Landscapes of Paradox. Geopolitics, 15(1), 1–21. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/14650040903420362
Brzezinski, Z. (2001). Veliki promašaj. Podgorica: VizArt.
Davies, N. (2005). God's Playground, Vol. II. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Domber, G. (2014). Empowering Revolution. Chapel Hill: University of North Carolina Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5149/northcarolina/9781469618517.001.0001
Dyduch, J., & Góra, M. (2024). Polish Reactions to Russian Aggression. In Polarization, Shifting Borders (pp. 305–325). Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-44584-2_18
Geopolitical Futures. (2024). A Closer Look at NATO Spending. March 15, 2024.
Herz, J. H. (1950). Idealist Internationalism. World Politics, 2(2), 157–180. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009187
Institute for Strategic Studies. (2023). Poland's Bid to Participate in NATO Nuclear Sharing.
Jervis, R. (1976). Perception and Misperception. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
Jervis, R. (1978). Cooperation Under the Security Dilemma. World Politics, 30(2), 167–214. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009958
Jervis, R. (1979). Deterrence Theory Revisited. World Politics, 31(2), 289–324. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2009945
Kemp-Welch, A. (2008). Poland Under Communism. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619779
Knopf, J. W. (2012). Varieties of Assurance. Journal of Strategic Studies, 35(3), 375–399. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/01402390.2011.643567
Kramer, M. (1999). The Kuklinski Files. Cold War International History Project Bulletin, 11, 58–95.
Kupiecki, R. (2022). Poland's Security Policy. SİYASAL, 31(Suppl. 1), S27–S43. DOI: https://doi.org/10.26650/siyasal.2022.31.945221
Lanoszka, A. (2018). Atomic Assurance. Ithaca: Cornell University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501729188.001.0001
Lanoszka, A. (2020). Poland in a Time of Geopolitical Flux. Contemporary Politics, 26(4), 458–474. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/13569775.2020.1777042
MacEachin, D. J. (2002). U.S. Intelligence and the Confrontation in Poland. Pennsylvania State University.
Morgan, P. M. (2003). Deterrence Now. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511491573
Paczkowski, A., & Byrne, M. (2007). From Solidarity to Martial Law. Budapest: CEU Press. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9786155211157
Prazmowska, A. (2010). Poland: A Modern History. London: I.B. Tauris. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9780755621279
Sanford, G. (2005). Katyn and the Soviet Massacre of 1940. London: Routledge.
Schelling, T. C. (1960). The Strategy of Conflict. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
Sikorski, R. (2022). Lecture on Russia Ukraine War. German Council on Foreign Relations.
Snyder, G. H. (1984). The Security Dilemma. World Politics, 36(4), 461–495. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2010183
Vaughan, P. (2020). Between Two Ages: Zbigniew Brzezinski. EJTS, 8(1), 144–154.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.



