THE LITHIUM CONUNDRUM IN SERBIA’S SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE: A DIPLOMATIC LITMUS TEST FOR BECOMING OR NOT BECOMING RECONCILED WITH THE PLANETARY LIMITS

Authors

  • Jelica Stefanović-Štambuk University of Belgrade, Faculty of Political Science, Republic of Serbia Author
  • Ana Vuković Institute of Social Sciences, Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0401239s

Keywords:

lithium, sustainability, planetary limits, planoferal capitalism, green transformation, Serbia's sustainability governance

Abstract

Technological integration of the silicon chip, personal computer, mobile computing devices, the Internet, and the first smartphone drastically reshaped economic, social, environmental, governance, and global relationships in the 20th century. At its and the second millennium turn, a new type of international relations was agreed upon in the most inclusive United Nations multilateral diplomatic setting, heralding the digital age emergence from the core contradictions of the computer era. Although the principle of respect for nature was put forward, avaricious “carboniferous capitalism” added to its gluttonous menu of critical minerals (silicon, cobalt, lithium, and manganese) the rare earth minerals for feeding its insatiable craving to envelop the global physical space within its coordinates of the free digital flows. ‘Carboniferous capitalism’ counts on the exponential yield of expandingly circulating matter, money, meaning, surplus value, and emotions to overcome its limit. This is the patent disregard for the ginormous pillage of the planet’s wealth, adversely affecting the already most disadvantaged of peoples and worst damaged spaces. Unsustainability is running high despite commitments to sustainable development. When lithium was announced as the key critical material in the 21st century to cure economic, social, and environmental disorders of no-limit capitalism, a new era of geopolitical struggle commenced. The recent lithium insertion into sustainability pursuit parallels its use in 20th-century medical practice as a cure for mental disorders. Helpful at first, often bringing more harm than good. Later, the Nobel Prize award promoted it as an allegedly scientifically proven remedy for disorders in “carboniferous capitalism”. Peddled as material for sustainability, enabling a significant leap forward by contributing to the decarbonization of those human activities negatively impacting climate and harming the people and planet caused both the ‘lithium rush’ and the inflamed grassroots resistance where its mining and production are ongoing or are planned to be undertaken. Lithium extractivist’s ills abound worldwide. The well-recorded and detailed experiences show how, from start to finish, grabbing for it led by major foreign corporations left behind the irreparable destruction of the environment. Lithium believers purport that it advances the transition to a green economy through formal pledges to sustainable mining as a way of human reconciliation with the planetary limits. Instead of consenting to these unduly substantiated claims, societies’ defiance has spiked in the rapidly fragmenting international system. Diplomacy enters the fray to foster negotiated regulations between those who produce lithium and those who hold raw materials for its exploitation. Therefore, lithium is also a diplomatic litmus test, not just for making a genuinely modern world with a sustainable future. A clear bill of its green soundness requires screening its overall processing, from exploration to the final use in the circular economy’s terms. It must guarantee a clean, healthy, safe and secure environment, which is an internationally recognized inalienable human right. Many solely regard the foregrounded issues through the “resource curse” lens. Lithium rapidly becomes a novel global diplomatic actant spanning borders. Being part and parcel of overcoming some limits while pressuring others even more, it is also a new global instigator of human actions from conforming to resisting the redrawing of lines of inclusion and exclusion in the planetary web of networked relationships among humanity and humanity’s relationships with nature. We attempted to disentangle Serbia's lithium mining conundrum in its sustainability governance framework by employing the briefly outlined intersectional conceptual approach and the diplomatic dissection method of relevant textual materials and data.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Barrios, R. (2017). What does catastrophe reveal for whom? The anthropology of crises and disasters at the onset of the Anthropocene. Annual Review of Anthropology 46 (1), 151–166. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-anthro-102116-041635

Bensaude-Vinsent, B. ed. (2022). Between Nature and Society: Biographies of Materials. Singapore, Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd.

Boin, A. (2004). Lessons from Crisis Research. International Studies Review 6 (1), 165–194. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1521-9488.2004.393_2.x

Donati, P. (2021). Transcending Modernity with Relational Thinking, New York, New York, USA: Routledge. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003146698

Duncan, R. (2005). The Dollar Crisis: Causes, Consequence, Cures, rev. edn. New York, New York, USA: John Wiley & Sons.

Ergo Strategy Group. (2023). The Jadar Project: An economic impact assessment of the Jadar lithium-borates project. London, UK: Ergo Strategy Group Ltd.

International Union for Conservation of Nature (IUCN). (1980). World Conservation Strategy: Living Resource Conservation for Sustainable Development. https://portals.iucn.org/library/efiles/documents/wcs-004.pdf.

Koselleck, R. (1988). Critique and Crisis: Enlightenment and the Pathogenesis of Modern Society. Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA: The MIT Press.

Kunasz, I. (2024). The Lithium Legacy. Singapore, Singapore: Jenny Stanford Publishing Pte. Ltd. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003372363

Marković, P. and Đereg, N. eds. (2022). Zbornik radova Rudarstvo – opasnosti i izazovi u zaštiti životne sredine [Collection of Papers Mining – dangers and challenges in environmental protection]. Subotica, Serbia: Centar za ekologiju i održivi razvoj. Retrieved from: https://www.cekor.org/documents/pages/725_1.pdf.

National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA). (1969). United States Congress, Washington, D.C., USA. Retrieved from https://www.energy.gov/nepa/articles/national-environmental-policy-act-1969.

Norton, G. M. (2023). A Modern History of Materials: From Stability to Sustainability. Cham, Switzerland: Springer Nature. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-23990-8

Obradović, D. (2023). Uticaj litijuma na stratešku bezbednost Srbije [The impact of Lithium on Serbian Strategic Security]. Belgrade, Serbia: Centar za stratešku analizu.

Okanović, M. et al. (2020). Lithium in the treatment of bipolar disorder –monitoring of the adverse effects. Med Pregl, LXXIII (1-2): 49-53. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS20020490. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/MPNS2002049O

Rockström, J. et al. (2021). Identifying a safe and just corridor for people and the planet. Earth's Future, 9 (4), 1-7. Retrieved from https://doi.org/e2020EF001866 https://agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/pdfdirect/10.1029/2020EF001866.

Roitman, J. (2012). Crisis. Political concepts: A critical lexicon. Retrieved from https://www.politicalconcepts.org/roitman-crisis/.

Romero Valenzuela, J. (2020). Natural Resource Governance, Grievances and Conflict: The Case of the Bolivian Lithium Program. Wiesbaden, Germany: Springer VS. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-27236-4

Spellman, F. R. (2024). The Science of Lithium. Boca Raton, FL, USA: CRC Press.

Stefanović-Štambuk, J. (2024). Rased savršenog kruga vladavine Evropske unije na Zapadnom Balkanu diplomatijom Evropskog zelenog dogovora [Rift in the European Union’s Perfect Governance Cycle of Green Deal Diplomacy in the Western Balkans]. Politička revija [Political Review], Online First. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.5937/pr83-53356. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pr83-53356

Strange, S. (1972). The Dollar Crisis 1971. International Affairs 48 (2), 191-216. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2613437

United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change [UNFCCC]. (2022). What is the Triple Planetary Crisis?. Retrieved from https://unfccc.int/blog/what-is-the-triple-planetary-crisis.

University of California (UCLA). (2021). What is sustainability?. Sustainability. Retrieved from https://www.sustain.ucla.edu/what-is-sustainability/.

Vuković, A. (2022). Digital Evidence and Protection of Personal Data: Sociological and Law Aspect. VII International Scientific Thematic Conference Digitalization in Penal Law and Judiciary, Proceedings of International Significance. Belgrade, Serbia: Institute of Comparative Law; Institute of Criminological and Sociological Research, pp. 131-139. DOI: https://doi.org/10.56461/ZR_22.DUKPP.10

World Commission on Environment and Development (WCED). (1987). Development and International Economic Co-operation: Environment: Report of the World Commission on Environment and Development: note by the Secretary-General. A/42/427. United Nations, New York, USA. Retrieved from https://digitallibrary.un.org/record/139811#record-files-collapse-header.

Downloads

Published

2025-04-09

How to Cite

Stefanović-Štambuk, J., & Vuković , A. (2025). THE LITHIUM CONUNDRUM IN SERBIA’S SUSTAINABILITY GOVERNANCE: A DIPLOMATIC LITMUS TEST FOR BECOMING OR NOT BECOMING RECONCILED WITH THE PLANETARY LIMITS. SCIENCE International Journal, 4(1), 239-245. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0401239s

Similar Articles

1-10 of 204

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.