THE IMPORTANCE OF DYNAMIC SECURITY FOR MAINTAINING ORDER, LEGITIMACY AND THE PREVENTION OF VIOLENCE IN PRISON

Authors

  • Ivan Lazarević Belgrade Correctional Institution in Padinska Skela, Republic of Serbia Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0502xx

Keywords:

dynamic security, prison, maintaining order, prison officers, prevention of violence

Abstract

The paper examines the importance of dynamic security for maintaining order, legitimacy and the prevention of violence in the prison environment. It is based on the contemporary understanding that prison security cannot be founded exclusively on static measures, such as walls, locks, cameras, physical separation and formal supervision, but depends to a considerable extent on the quality of everyday relationships between prison officers and convicted persons. Dynamic security involves the constant professional presence of officers in prison life, communication with prisoners, observation of the prison atmosphere, knowledge of individual behaviour and the ability to identify risks at an early stage. The main aim of the paper is to show that dynamic security has an important preventive function. Violence in prison does not arise solely as a consequence of the individual characteristics of convicted persons, but also as a result of the prison regime, institutional culture, the quality of management, living conditions and relationships between staff and prisoners. For this reason, the role of prison officers is particularly significant, as through everyday contact they are able to recognise changes in behaviour, tensions among prisoners and situations that may develop into conflict. Timely intervention, conflict de-escalation and the adjustment of responses to the specific situation represent key elements of dynamic security. The paper also considers the relationship between dynamic security and the legitimacy of prison authority. When convicted persons perceive prison officers as professional, consistent, fair and capable of maintaining order without unnecessary repression, the likelihood of voluntary compliance with rules increases. In this way, dynamic security contributes to a more stable prison climate, the reduction of tensions and the strengthening of trust in the institution. The paper concludes that dynamic security is not a replacement for static security, but its necessary complement. Its value lies in the fact that it connects control, communication and prevention, thereby contributing to the maintenance of order, the reduction of violence and the creation of a more humane and safer prison environment.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Auty, K. M., & Liebling, A. (2024). What is a ‘good enough’prison? An empirical analysis of key thresholds using prison moral quality data. European Journal of Criminology, 21(5), 725-753. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708241227693

Engstrom, K. V., & Van Ginneken, E. F. (2022). Ethical prison architecture: A systematic literature review of prison design features related to wellbeing. Space and culture, 25(3), 479-503. https://doi.org/10.1177/12063312221104211

Hofinger, V., & Pflegerl, P. (2024). A reality check on the digitalisation of prisons: Assessing the opportunities and risks of providing digital technologies for prisoners. Punishment & Society, 26(5), 898-916. https://doi.org/10.1177/14624745241237190

Howard, M. V., Corben, S. P., Raudino, A., & Galouzis, J. J. (2020). Maintaining safety in the prison environment: A multilevel analysis of inmate victimisation in assaults. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 64(10-11), 1091-1113.

Miranda, D. (2024). Carceral surveillance: Data flows within and beyond prison walls. Incarceration, 5, 1-19. https://doi.org/10.1177/26326663241237966

Mjåland, K., Laursen, J., Schliehe, A., & Larmour, S. (2023). Contrasts in freedom: Comparing the experiences of imprisonment in open and closed prisons in England and Wales and Norway. European Journal of Criminology, 20(5), 1641-1662. https://doi.org/10.1177/14773708211065905

Ryan, C., & Bergin, M. (2022). Procedural justice and legitimacy in prisons: A review of extant empirical literature. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 49(2), 143-163. https://doi.org/10.1177/00938548211053367

Sørensen, K. M., Midtlyng, G., & Boe, O. C. (2024). Educating for a better understanding of dynamic security in a prison context: how prison officers can learn to better read and calibrate their responses to violent inmates. In ICERI2024 Proceedings (pp. 2291-2299). IATED.

Testoni, I., Nencioni, I., Arbien, M., Iacona, E., Marrella, F., Gorzegno, V., Selmi, C., Vianello, F., Nava, A., Zamperini, A., & Wieser, M. A. (2021). Mental health in prison: Integrating the perspectives of prison staff. International journal of environmental research and public health, 18(21), 11254. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182111254

Wooldredge, J. (2020). Prison culture, management, and in-prison violence. Annual review of criminology, 3(1), 165-188. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-criminol-011419-041359

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Lazarević, I. (2026). THE IMPORTANCE OF DYNAMIC SECURITY FOR MAINTAINING ORDER, LEGITIMACY AND THE PREVENTION OF VIOLENCE IN PRISON. SCIENCE International Journal, 5(2), 251-256. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0502xx

Similar Articles

11-20 of 129

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.