YOUNG PEOPLE AND COHABITATION – EXPERIENCES AND ATTITUDES
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0401173dKeywords:
cohabitation, young people, experience, attitudes, Serbia.Abstract
Cohabitation has become an important form of romantic partnership, gaining momentum especially over the
last several decades and specifically among young people. Their cohabitations can be seen either as a probationary, premarital
period or as an alternative lifestyle. Several studies examine various aspects of cohabitation in contemporary Serbia. However,
there is a lack of studies on the subject of young people’s experiences and perception of cohabitation. This study aims to
analyze: a) the prevalence of cohabitation among young people, b) their attitudes towards cohabitation and c) the sociological
profile of those who cohabit. The research goal is to provide a sociological explanation of the factors that shape young people’s
experiences of cohabitation as well as their perception of it (both as a specific form of partnership and in comparison to marriage).
According to the main hypothesis, there is a discrepancy between young people`s experience and perception of cohabitation.
There are three supporting hypotheses: a) few young people cohabited, b) young people have generally positive attitude towards
cohabitation and c) cohabitation experience and perception depend on key socio-demographic and economic characteristics
of the respondents. The characteristics of young people’s experience and attitudes towards cohabitation were analyzed based
on data collected in 2024 through a survey. The sample includes 989 respondents, aged 18 to 34, living in the Autonomous
province of Vojvodina, Republic of Serbia. An online questionnaire consisting of 40 questions was initially distributed via social
networks (snowball sampling). Data analysis was conducted in SPSS 26.0, using basic statistical methods (descriptive statistics,
correlation coefficient, non-parametric tests) and principal component analysis. Results supported the main and supporting
hypotheses. For the young people, cohabitation is more an acceptable idea than a realistic practice, which questions the scope
of de-standardization of the life trajectory of young people in contemporary Serbia.
Downloads
References
Bandalović, G. (2017). Stavovi mladih o kohabitaciji. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 24(1): 45-70. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp. v24i1.1362. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v24i1.1362
Bartolac, A. (2013). Stavovi studenata o kohabitaciji i braku. Socijalna ekologija, 22(2): 107-131.
Bobić, M. (2012). Stalled de-standardization of partnerships – case of young people in Serbia. Sociologija, 54(2): 351-367. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1202351B. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC1202351B
Bobić, M. (2014). Specific (Blocked) Post-socialist Union Transformation in Serbia. Sociologija i prostor, 52(2): 207-225. https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.52.2.5. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5673/sip.52.2.5
Boneta, Ž. & Mrakovčić, M. (2021). Studentski stavovi o braku, kohabitaciji i tranziciji u brak. Revija za socijalnu politiku, 28(2): 205-224. https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v28i2.1745. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3935/rsp.v28i2.1745
Coast, E. (2009). Currently cohabiting: relationship attitudes, expectations and outcomes. In J. Stillwell, E. Coast & D. Kneale (eds.) Fertility, living arrangements care and mobility: understanding population trends and processes (pp. 105-125). Dordrecht, the Netherlands: Springer. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-9682-2_6
De Coninck, D., Van Doren, S. & Matthijs, K. (2020). Attitudes of Young Adults toward Marriage and Divorce, 2002–2018. Journal of Divorce & Remarriage, 62(1): 66–82. https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2020.1833292. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/10502556.2020.1833292
Gavrilović, D. & Stjepanović Zaharijevski, D. (2012). Tradicionalne i moderne vrednosti u tranzicionoj Srbiji. Teme, 36(3): 1087-1102.
Gold, J. M. (2012). Typologies of Cohabitation: Implications for Clinical Practice and Research. The Family Journal, 20(3), 315-321. https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712449603. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/1066480712449603
Landaud, F. (2021). From employment to engagement? Stable jobs, temporary jobs, and cohabiting relationships. Labour Economics, 73: 102077. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102077. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.labeco.2021.102077
Lesthaeghe, R. (2020). The second demographic transition, 1986–2020: sub-replacement fertility and rising cohabitation—a global update. Genus 76, 10. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41118-020-00077-4
Manić, I. (2017). Vrednosne orijentacije i porodične vrednosti mladih u Srbiji (PhD dissertation). Niš: Filozofski fakultet.
Manning, WD, Smock, PJ, Dorius, C. & Cooksey, E. (2014). Cohabitation Expectations among Young Adults in the United States: Do They Match Behavior? Population Research and Policy Review, 33(2): 287-305. http://doi.org/10.1007/ s11113-013-9316-3. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s11113-013-9316-3
Mynarska, M. & Bernardi, L. (2007). Meanings and attitudes attached to cohabitation in Poland: Qualitative analyses of the slow diffusion of cohabitation among the young generation. Demographic Research, 16: 519-554. http://doi.org/10.4054/ DemRes.2007.16.17. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4054/DemRes.2007.16.17
Negovanović, O. (2017). Zastupljenost i osnovne karakteristike vanbračnih zajednica u Srbiji i Evropskoj uniji. Demografija, 14: 65-82.
Penev, G. & Stanković, B. (2010). Vanbračna rađanja i vanbračne zajednice: između marginalizacije i modernizacije. Demografski pregled, 10(37): 1-4.
Petrović, M. (2011). Promene bračnosti i porodičnih modela u postsocijalističkim zemljama - zakasnela i nepotpuna ili specifična druga demografska tranzicija. Stanovništvo, 49(1): 53-78.
Popadić, D., Pavlović, Z. & Mihailović, S. (2019). Mladi u Srbiji 2018/2019. Belgrade: Friedrich Ebert Stiftung.
Prinz, C. (1995), Cohabiting, Married or Single, England: IIASA.
Ranđelović, D. & Šolaja, I. (2019). Vanbračne zajednice u propisima država bivše SFRJ. Godišnjak Fakulteta pravnih nauka, 9(9): 215-225. DOI: https://doi.org/10.7251/GFP1909215R
RAV (2024). Ekonomsko ogledalo. (https://rav.org.rs/wp-content/uploads/2024/10/EO-03-MAR-2024-SR-WEB.pdf).
RZS (2023a). Starost i pol – podaci po naseljima. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.
RZS (2023b). Bračni status – podaci po opštinama i gradovima. Beograd: Republički zavod za statistiku.
Tomanović, S. & Ignjatović, S. (2006). Attitudes on transition to adulthood among young people in Serbia. Sociologija, 48(1): 55-72. https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC0601055T. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2298/SOC0601055T
Tomanović, S. & Stanojević, D. (2015). Mladi u Srbiji 2015. Stanja, opažanja, verovanja i nadanja, Beograd: FES i SeCons.
Tomanović, S. & Stanojević, D. (2022). Family Formation in Serbia between Normative Legacy, Structural Constraints and Desired Prospects. In M. Emirhafizović, T. Heiman, M. Medgyesi, C. Pinheiro Mota, S. Tomanović & S. Vella (eds). Family Formation Among Youth in Europe: Coping with Socio-Economic Disadvantages (pp. 175-190). USA: Information Age Publishing.
Tomanović, S. (2012a). Tranzicije u porodičnom domenu. In S. Tomanović, D. Stanojević, I. Jarić, D. Mojić, S. Dragišić Labaš,
M. Ljubičić & I. Živadinović (eds). Mladi – naša sadašnjost. Istraživanje socijalnih biografija mladih u Srbiji (pp. 127-146). Belgrade: ISIFF.
Tomanović, S. (2012b). Od omladine do socijalnih biografija mladih u postsocijalističkoj transformaciji društva Srbije: konceptualni i kontekstualni okvir istraživanja. In S. Tomanović, D. Stanojević, I. Jarić, D. Mojić, S. Dragišić Labaš,
M. Ljubičić & I. Živadinović (eds). Mladi – naša sadašnjost. Istraživanje socijalnih biografija mladih u Srbiji (pp. 9-42). Belgrade: ISIFF.
Tomanović, S., Stanojević, D. & Ljubičić, M. (2016). Postajanje roditeljem u Srbiji. Sociološko istraživanje tranzicije u roditeljstvo. Beograd: ISIFF.
Willoughby, B. & Carroll, J. (2012). Correlates of Attitudes toward Cohabitation: Looking at the Associations with Demographics, Relational Attitudes, and Dating Behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 33(11): 1450–1476. http://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11429666. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0192513X11429666
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
