RESILIENCE OF CRITICAL INFRASTRUCTURE AS A NATIONAL SECURITY FACTOR: STUDENT PERCEPTIONS OF ITS PERFORMANCE IN A CURRENT HYBRID ENVIRONMENT
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0501133iKeywords:
critical infrastructure, resilience, national security, war in UkraineAbstract
The contemporary hybrid security environment positions critical infrastructure as both a strategic asset and a potential vulnerability for national security. The growing interdependence among infrastructure sectors increases the risk of systemic disruptions with broad social and economic consequences. Evidence from recent armed conflicts, including the war in Ukraine, confirms the significance of infrastructure facilities as targets of combined and hybrid operations.
The aim of the present study is to assess the level of awareness among students at the Rakovski National Defence College regarding the resilience of critical infrastructure and its impact on national security. The research employs a qualitative design based on semi-structured questionnaires administered to a sample of 23 participants. The analysis focuses on determining the level of knowledge, the assessment of the condition and functioning of national infrastructure systems, as well as perceived risks and vulnerabilities.
The findings indicate a relatively high level of awareness concerning the strategic importance of infrastructure systems, while also identifying deficiencies related to resilience assessment and interinstitutional coordination. On this basis, recommendations are formulated to enhance education and professional training, and to strengthen the integrated civil-military approach to risk management. The resilience of critical infrastructure is conceptualized as a dynamic process requiring systematic prevention, protection, and recovery measures in the context of hybrid threats.
The results of the study indicate that Bulgaria's national critical infrastructure has clear regulatory frameworks and certain protective mechanisms in place, but practical effectiveness remains limited. The main challenges are related to the human factor, inter-agency coordination, preparedness, and vulnerability to hybrid and multi-domain threats. The international environment and regional conflicts significantly increase these risks. An integrated approach is required, including updating regulatory documents, enhancing technical and cyber protection, conducting regular exercises, facilitating information sharing, and promoting cross-sector cooperation, in order to ensure the resilience of critical infrastructure and the security of the state.
Downloads
References
Batorowska, H. (2025). Information security awareness: Between ignorance and consciousness of threats. Polish Journal of Security and Threats, Article 1242. https://doi.org/10.36702/pb.1242 DOI: https://doi.org/10.36702/pb.1242
Beck, U. (1992). Risk society: Towards a new modernity (M. Ritter, Trans.). Sage Publications.
Berezutskyi, V., & Tokhtamysh, T. (2024). Risks of critical infrastructures during war. Law and innovative society, 2, 55-68, DOI:10.37772/2309-9275-2024-2(23)-5 DOI: https://doi.org/10.37772/2309-9275-2024-2(23)-5
Directive (EU) 2022/2557 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 14 December 2022 on the resilience of critical entities and repealing Council Directive 2008/114/EC. (2022). Official Journal of the European Union. https://eur-lex.europa.eu
Flynn, S. E. (2004). America the vulnerable: How our government is failing to protect us from terrorism. HarperCollins Publishers.
Homer-Dixon, T. (2006). The Upside of Down: Catastrophe, Creativity, and the Renewal of Civilization. Island Press. (https://islandpress.org/books/upside-down)
Mantea, P. D. (2019). Security awareness in Romania: Security culture as a pillar of social responsibility development. Land Forces Academy Review, 24(3), 199–207. https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2019-0023 DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/raft-2019-0023
NATO. (2022). NATO 2022 Strategic Concept. North Atlantic Treaty Organization. https://www.nato.int
Nye, J. S., Jr. (2011). The future of power. PublicAffairs.
Ostrowski, P., & Zych, R. (2024). State’s resilience to critical infrastructure threats: The example of the Russian war on Ukraine. Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie, 17(2), 349–363. https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9050
Piekarski, M. (2025). Critical infrastructure as a target of hybrid and conventional attacks: Lessons from the Ukrainian experience. Terrorism – Studies, Analyses, Prevention (special edition): 113–132. DOI: https://doi.org/10.4467/27204383TER.25.016.21519
Piotr Ostrowski & Radosław Zych (2024) – State’s Resilience to Critical Infrastructure Threats: the Example of the Russian War on Ukraine. December 2024. Teka Komisji Prawniczej PAN Oddział w Lublinie 17(2):349-363. DOI:10.32084/tkp.9050 DOI: https://doi.org/10.32084/tkp.9050
Principles for Resilient Infrastructure. (2022). UNDRR UN Office for Disaster Risk Reduction. Sendai Framework for Disaster Risk Reduction 2015-2030. 7bis Avenue de la Paix, CH1211 Geneva 2, Switzerland. https://www.undrr.org/publication/principles-resilient-infrastructure=
Renn, O. (2008). Risk Governance: Coping with Uncertainty in a Complex World. London: Earthscan.
Schein, E. H. (2010). Organizational culture and leadership (4th ed.). Jossey-Bass.
Sertov, P. (2008). Prevention as a primary method for protecting critical infrastructure in the work of the State Agency for National Security (DANS). In Proceedings of the Sixth International Conference “Security in Southeast Europe, Public–Private Partnership and Critical Infrastructure” (September 11–12, 2008). Academy of the Ministry of Interior.
Shahri, A. B., Ismail, Z., & Rahim, N. Z. A. (2013). Security culture and security awareness as the basic factors for security effectiveness in health information systems. Jurnal Teknologi (Sciences and Engineering), 64(2), 7–12. https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2212 DOI: https://doi.org/10.11113/jt.v64.2212
Sheffi, Y. (2013). The resilient enterprise: Overcoming vulnerability for competitive advantage. MIT Press.
Slovic, P. (1987). Perception of risk. Science, 236(4799), 280–285. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1126/science.3563507
United Nations Office for Disaster Risk Reduction (UNDRR). (2022). Principles for resilient infrastructure. UNDRR. https://www.undrr.org/publication/principles-resilient-infrastructure
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
