THE ISCR MODEL IN MUSIC THERAPY: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL REGULATION IN STRESS AND ANXIETY

Authors

  • Liliya Tumbeva Academy of Music, Dance and Fine Arts “Prof. Asen Diamandiev” – Plovdiv, Bulgaria Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0502237t

Keywords:

music therapy, ISCR model, psychophysiological regulation, regulatory capacity, stress and anxiety

Abstract

This study presents the Integrative Synchronization–Change–Regulation (ISCR) model as an integrative conceptual framework for understanding psychophysiological regulation in the context of music therapy. The model conceptualizes music therapy as a multilevel process that integrates neuroscientific, psychophysiological, and cognitive–affective mechanisms, framing regulation as a dynamic coordination between brain networks, the autonomic nervous system, and interoceptive processes. The theoretical foundation of the model is based on the integration of key approaches, including neurovisceral integration, polyvagal theory, and rhythmic entrainment, which are synthesized into a coherent and sequential regulatory framework. In this context, music therapy is positioned as a structured bottom-up intervention that operates through sensory activation and physiological synchronization, leading to affective and cognitive modulation and ultimately resulting in sustained psychophysiological regulation. The ISCR model is structured into four interrelated stages: Input, Synchronization, Change, and Regulation, which describe the transition from sensory stimulation to stable regulatory outcomes. This process emphasizes the role of synchronization as a central mechanism linking physiological and psychological processes and enabling the coordination of internal rhythms and external stimuli. As a conceptual contribution, the model shifts the focus from symptom reduction toward the expansion of regulatory capacity, defined as the ability to maintain adaptive stability under varying internal and external conditions. In addition, the study outlines a quasi-experimental framework that may serve as a basis for future empirical validation of the model.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Bernardi, L., Porta, C., & Sleight, P. (2006). Cardiovascular, cerebrovascular, and respiratory changes induced by different types of music in musicians and non-musicians: The importance of silence. European Journal of Internal Medicine, 17(8), 529–535. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejim.2006.05.011

Cohen, S., Kamarck, T., & Mermelstein, R. (1983). A global measure of perceived stress. Journal of Health and Social Behavior, 24(4), 385–396. https://doi.org/10.2307/2136404

de Witte, M., Pinho, A. da S., Stams, G.-J., Moonen, X., Bos, A. E. R., & van Hooren, S. (2022). Music therapy for stress reduction: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Health Psychology Review, 16(1), 134–159. https://doi.org/10.1080/17437199.2020.1846580

Koelsch, S. (2014). Brain correlates of music-evoked emotions. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 15(3), 170–180. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrn3666

Levitin, D. J. (2006). This is your brain on music: The science of a human obsession. Dutton.

Pando-Naude, V., Patyczek, A., Bonetti, L., & Vuust, P. (2021). An ALE meta-analytic review of top-down and bottom-up processing of music in the brain. Scientific Reports, 11, 20813. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-00139-3

Porges, S. W. (2011). The polyvagal theory: Neurophysiological foundations of emotions, attachment, communication, and self-regulation. W. W. Norton & Company.

Porges, S. W. (2022). Polyvagal theory: A science of safety. Frontiers in Integrative Neuroscience, 16, 871227. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnint.2022.871227

Salimpoor, V. N., Benovoy, M., Larcher, K., Dagher, A., & Zatorre, R. J. (2011). Anatomically distinct dopamine release during anticipation and experience of peak emotion to music. Nature Neuroscience, 14(2), 257–262. https://doi.org/10.1038/nn.2726

Shadish, W. R., Cook, T. D., & Campbell, D. T. (2002). Experimental and quasi-experimental designs for generalized causal inference. Houghton Mifflin.

Spielberger, C. D. (1983). Manual for the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (Form Y). Consulting Psychologists Press.

Suksasilp, C., & Garfinkel, S. N. (2022). Towards a comprehensive assessment of interoception in a multi-dimensional framework. Biological Psychology, 168, 108262. htt, 108262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biopsycho.2022.108262

Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2000). A model of neurovisceral integration in emotion regulation and dysregulation. Journal of Affective Disorders, 61(3), 201–216. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-0327(00)00338-4

Trost, W., Labbé, C., & Grandjean, D. (2017). Rhythmic entrainment as a musical affect induction mechanism. Neuropsychologia, 96, 96–110. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2017.01.004

Vuust, P., Heggli, O. A., Friston, K. J., & Kringelbach, M. L. (2022). Music in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 23(5), 287–305. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41583-022-00578-5

Downloads

Published

2026-05-27

How to Cite

Tumbeva, L. (2026). THE ISCR MODEL IN MUSIC THERAPY: AN INTEGRATIVE FRAMEWORK FOR PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGICAL REGULATION IN STRESS AND ANXIETY. SCIENCE International Journal, 5(2), 237-243. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0502237t

Similar Articles

1-10 of 122

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.