LEX SPORTIVA AND THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT

Authors

  • Imran A. Rašljanin State University in Novi Pazar Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0203085r

Keywords:

Sports law, lex sportiva, arbitration, court

Abstract

This comprehensive analysis explores the profound impact of the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) on the realm of global sports law. Against the backdrop of a remarkable increase in case procedures, this study highlights at least three pivotal functions of CAS.

Firstly, CAS has introduced the application of general legal principles within sports institutions, leading to the formulation of the distinct "principia sportive," which has bolstered legal certainty in the field. Secondly, CAS assumes a vital role in interpreting and implementing sports law, influencing the establishment of binding regulations within sports organizations. Thirdly, CAS's superior status allows it to harmonize the global legal landscape by assuming jurisdiction over disputes involving sports bodies and federations.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Turner, R. (2005). Arbitration Awards – A Practical Approach. Blackwell Publishing. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9780470759608

Bhala, R. (1999). The Myth about Stare Decisis and International Trade Law. 14 Am. U. International L. Rev, 1999.

Latty, F. (2007). La lex sportiva. Recherche sur le droit transnational. Brill. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004156975.i-850

Nafziger, A. R. (2004). Lex Sportiva and CAS. In The Court of Arbitration for Sport 1984-2004.

Burkert, W. (1983). Pelops at Olympia. In Homo Necans. University of California Press.

Findling, J. E., & Pelle, K. D. (2009). Encyclopedia of the Modern Olympic Movement. Greenwood Press.

Beloff, M., Kerr, T., & Demetriou, M. (1999). Sports Law. Hart.

Teubner, G. (2001). Un droit spontané dans la société mondiale. In Le droit saisi par la mondialisation (Ed. C.-A. Morand). Bruylant.

Tarasti, L. (2000). Legal Solutions in the International Doping Cases – Awards by the IAAF Arbitration Panel 1985-1999. Milano.

Kane, D. (2003). Twenty Years On: An Evaluation of the Court of Arbitration for Sport.

Ganić, S. (2017). Praktikum za međunarodno javno pravo – Teorija i praksa. Državni univerzitet u Novom Pazaru.

Fir, L. L. (2010). Međunarodno javno pravo. Pravni fakultet u Beogradu.

Etinski, R., & Đajić, S. (2012). Međunarodno javno pravo. Pravni fakultet u Novom Sadu.

Avramov, S., & Kreća, M. (2009). Međunarodno javno pravo. Pravni fakultet Univerziteta u Beogradu. Službeni glasnik.

Lever, J. (1999). Why Procedure Is More Important than Substantive Law. 48 International and Comparative Law Quarterly. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S002058930006320X

Lindholm, J. (2019). The Court of Arbitration for Sport and Its Jurisprudence - An Empirical Inquiry into Lex Sportiva. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-285-9

Schwab, B. (2018). Correction to Embedding the human rights of players in world sport. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s40318-018-0133-z

O’Leary, B. (2017). An Analysis of Case Law Impacting Campus Recreational Sport Programs.

Karaquillo, J. (2008). Code du sport – Annote and commente.

Kohler, G., Rigozzi, A. (2005). International Arbitration – Law and Practice in Switzerland. Oxford.

Web portals:

https://ordentliche-gerichtsbarkeit.hessen.de/

https://www.tas-cas.org/

Downloads

Published

2023-08-08

How to Cite

A. Rašljanin, I. (2023). LEX SPORTIVA AND THE COURT OF ARBITRATION FOR SPORT. SCIENCE International Journal, 2(3), 85-89. https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0203085r

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Similar Articles

1-10 of 74

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.