THE CHECHNYA CASES AS AN ILLUSTRATION OF THE WAY THE EUROPEAN COURT INTERPRETED THE PROCEDURAL OBLIGATION UNDER ARTICLE 2 OF THE EUROPEAN CONVENTION ON HUMAN RIGHTS
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35120/sciencej0301163mKeywords:
European Court of Human Rights, Article 2, Chechnya conflict, procedural obligations, investigation, accountability, right to lifeAbstract
This paper explores the European Court of Human Rights’ procedural obligations under Article 2 through the lens of three pivotal Chechnya conflict cases. It underscores the Court’s insistence on comprehensive investigations into forcerelated deaths, emphasizing accountability and proactive investigation initiation by state authorities. Highlighted cases illustrate systemic investigation failures, including premature closure, lack of thorough victim and witness identification, and procedural neglect. The paper critiques delayed and inadequate investigation efforts, underscoring the Court’s evolving jurisprudence towards more detailed investigative obligations under Article 2, reflecting a balance between upholding the right to life and addressing states’ operational challenges.
Downloads
References
Bindman, E. (2013). Russia, Chechnya and Strasbourg: Russian Official and Press Discourse on the ‘Chechen Cases’ at the European Court of Human Rights. Europe-Asia Studies, 65, 1954-1977. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2013.848640
Binienda, Maria Szonert. (2020). Standards of Investigation under Article of the European Convention on Human Rights and Investigations of Incidents of Historic Significance. Law and Administration in Post-Soviet Europe, 7, 34-42. DOI: https://doi.org/10.2478/lape-2020-0004
Bowring, Bill. (2018). Politics and Pragmatism: The Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and Its 20 Years of Engagement with the European Convention on Human Rights. East European Yearbook on Human Rights, 2018, 5-31. DOI: https://doi.org/10.5553/EEYHR/258977642018001001002
Chevalier-Watts, J. (2010). Effective investigations under Article 2 European Convention on Human Rights: Securing the right to life or an onerous burden on the state. The European Journal of International Law, 10, 701–721. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/ejil/chq045
European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Isayeva, Yusupova and Bazayeva v. Russia, Applications Nos. 57947/00, 57948/00 and 57949/00, Judgment. [Judgment]. February 24, 2005.
European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Isayeva v. Russia, Application No. 57950/00, Judgment. [Judgment]. February 24, 2005.
European Court of Human Rights. (2005). Khashiev and Akayeva v. Russia, Applications Nos. 57942/00 and 57945/00, Judgment. [Judgment]. February 24, 2005.
Glas, L. R. (2019). The european court of human rights supervising the execution of its judgments. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 37(3), 228-244. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919861844
Heydarli, Elkhan. (2020). Effective investigation as part of positive obligations of state: in the context of Northern Ireland conflict. Baku State University Law Review, 6(2), 124-134.
Quenivet, Noelle. (2019). The obligation to investigate after potential breach of article echr in an extra-territorial context: mission impossible for the armed forces. Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights, 37(2), 119-138. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0924051919844374
Williams, Andrew. (2020). War crimes allegations and the UK: towards fairer investigative process. Legal Studies. The Journal of the Society of Legal Scholars., 40(2), 301-320. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/lst.2019.34
Dissertation: Maric, D. (2019). Excessive use of force by the law enforcement officials in the light of Articles 2 and 3 of the European Convention on human rights. Universität Wien.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
